Unfolding Proactive Processes for Creativity: Integration of Employee Proactivity, Information Exchange, and Psychological Safety Perspectives

By Yaping Gong, S. Cheung, Mo Wang, Jia-Chi Huang. 2012

181 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2151c57584aa2110e50bdbc6ed87dabf5a106ad3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Guiyao Tang
2. Yun-Hwa Chiang
3. Zhike Lei
4. Yaping Gong
5. Fang Lee Cooke
6. Mo Wang
7. Sabina Bogilović
8. S. Cheung

Citations in the corpus

• Hiding behind a mask? Cultural intelligence, knowledge hiding, and individual and team creativity (2017, background): “…example, through knowledge exchange with different work units, employees can identify workrelated problems and improve their knowledge bases regarding those problems to generate new creative ideas for resolving problems in organizations (Frese & Fay, 2001; Gong et al., 2012; Grant & Ashford, 2008).”
• Psychological Safety: The History, Renaissance, and Future of an Interpersonal Construct (2014, background): “Gong et al. (2012) studied relationships among psychological safety, individual creativity, employee proactivity, and information exchange.”
• Impact of inclusive leadership on innovative work behavior: The role of psychological safety (2017, background): “Studies have also found positive effects of PS for not only idea generation, but also promotion and implementation of newly generated ideas (Kark & Carmeli, 2009; Klijn & Tomic, 2010; Gong et al., 2012; Kessel, Kratzer, & Schultz, 2012; Sharifirad, 2013).”
• The Role of Psychological Safety in Human Development (2016, unknown): “One critical function of authentic and empathetic relationships is that they provide individuals with a sense of trust and belonging (Gong, Cheung, Wang, & Huang, 2012; Seligson & MacPhee, 2004).”
• Research on Workplace Creativity: A Review and Redirection (2014, background): “Some studies following an actor-centered approach focus on the main effects of actors’ personality characteristics (proactive personality; Gong et al. 2012a), self-concepts (e.g., creative self-efficacy, Tierney& Farmer 2002, 2011; individual differentiation from teammates in terms of thinking and…”
• Creativity and Control: A Paradox. Evidence from the Levers of Control Framework (2017, unknown): “Empirical evidence provides support that information-exchange is important to teams striving toward achieving increased creative production (Chen et al. 2012; Gong, Cheung, Wang, and Huang 2012).”
• When and how does functional diversity influence team innovation? The mediating role of knowledge sharing and the moderation role of affect-based trust in a team (2016, background): “There has been increasing interest in how affective factors might influence information-related processes in teams (Gong et al., 2012; Hinsz et al., 1997).”
• Experienced high performance work system, extroversion personality, and creativity performance (2015, methodology): “To measure information exchange, we followed Gong et al. (2012) and argue that information exchange is similar to the concept of “communication” (Ancona & Caldwell, 1992) because “communication enables the sharing of information and ideas, which is a viable source of innovation” (Hulsheger,…”
• High-performance work system and employee creativity: The roles of perceived organisational support and devolved management (2017, methodology): “According to Gong et al. (2012), employee’s proactive behaviour would affect employee creativity, so we also controlled for employee’s proactive behaviour using the five-item scale from Parker et al. (2006) (α¼ 0.92).”