A Model of Future-Oriented Motivation and Self-Regulation
By Raymond Miller, Stephanie J. Brickman. 2004
467 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1defb1ad3f16afae0a173da888bc0b0f80ead2e1
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Allan Wigfield
- Jenna Cambria
- Barbara A. Greene
- D. McInerney
- Kit‐ling Lau
- A. Elliot
- Markus A. Maier
- Katherine Muenks
In Social Psychology
- Allan Wigfield
- Jenna Cambria
- D. McInerney
- Barbara A. Greene
- A. Elliot
- Kit‐ling Lau
- Markus A. Maier
- G. Liem
Citations in the corpus
- Occupational Future Time Perspective: A Meta-Analysis of Antecedents and Outcomes (2018, background): “…argued that thinking about the future allows people to motivate themselves and guide their actions in anticipation of future events; as such, the cognitive ability to plan and organize future activities is an important self ‐ regulatory mechanism to motivate employees (Miller & Brickman, 2004).”
- Associations Between Grit, Motivation, and Achievement in High School Students (2017, background): “…colleagues and Husman and her colleagues defined instrumentality as individuals’ beliefs about how the achievement activities they currently do will help them attain future goals (Greene, Miller, Crowson, Duke, & Akey, 2004; Husman, Derryberry, Crowson, & Lomax, 2004; Miller & Brickman, 2004).”
- Expectancy-value theory: retrospective and prospective (2010, background): “…important motivational construct that relates to achievement values, the instrumentality of an activity or set of activities (Greene, Miller, Crowson, Duke, & Aikey, 2004; Husman, Derryberry, Crowson, & Lomax, 2004; Husman & Lens, 1999; Miller & Brickman, 2004; Miller, DeBacker, & Greene, 1999).”
- Effects of Self-Efficacy, Emotional Intelligence, and Perceptions of Future Work Environment on Preservice Teacher Commitment (2014, background): “…the expectations that are held about the job (Buchanan, 2009; Chan, Lau, Nie, Lim, & Hogan, 2008; Inman & Marlow, 2004), the belief in its utility (Miller & Brickman, 2004), emotional awareness and resiliency (Brown, George-Curran, & Smith, 2003; Rots, Aelterman, Vlerick, & Vermeulen, 2007), and…”
- Examining Hong Kong students’ achievement goals and their relations with students’ perceived classroom environment and strategy use (2008, background): “Some researchers have argued that adding a future time perspective when studying students’ achievement goals can lead to greater understanding of students’ achievement behaviours and potentially more influential intervention (Lens, 2001 ; Miller & Brickman, 2004 ).”
- Liking or Disliking the Teacher: Student Motivation, Engagement and Achievement (2007, methodology): “As an extension to previous research on classroom goals (Brickman & Miller, 1998, 2001; DeBacker & Nelson, 1999; Greene et al., 1999, 2004; Miller & Brickman, 2004; Miller et al., 1996) we also predicted that students will report higher levels of learning goals, perceived instrumentality for…”
- Supporting Students' Motivation, Engagement, and Learning During an Uninteresting Activity (2008, background): “This conclusion has potential application not only for promoting value in uninteresting lessons but also for promoting valuing in students’ longterm future goals as well (Husman & Lens, 1999; Miller & Brickman, 2004).”
- The role of self- efficacy, task value, and achievement goals in predicting learning approaches and mathematics achievement (2010, background): “Miller and Brickman (2004) believe one factor predicting the choice of achievement goals among students is their valuation of long-term goals.”
- The Relationships Among Students' Future-Oriented Goals and Subgoals, Perceived Task Instrumentality, and Task-Oriented Self-Regulation Strategies in an Academic Environment (2008, methodology): “of predictions from the Miller and Brickman (2004) model.”
- The Reliability and Validity of Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory Scores in Academically Talented Adolescents (2007, unknown): “…67 Number 3 June 2007 487-504 2007 Sage Publications 10.1177/0013164406296985 http://epm.sagepub.com hosted at http://online.sagepub.com 487 Miller & Brickman, 2004; Phalet, Andriessen, & Lens, 2004; Simons et al., 2000; Simons et al., 2004), delay of gratification (Bembenutty &…”