The Reliability and Validity of Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory Scores in Academically Talented Adolescents

145 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A question of balance: Time perspective and well-being in British and Russian samples (2010, result): “Although most of these studies provide support for the ZTPI five-factor structure, there are a number of documented theoretical objections to it, including lack of valence in the future factor (Boniwell, 2009; Worrell & Mello, 2007).”
Predicting Educational Outcomes and Psychological Well-Being in Adolescents Using Time Attitude Profiles. (2014, background): “It was developed in response to data indicating that ZTPI scores were not always valid in adolescent samples (Worrell & Mello, 2007) and the absence of a subscale measuring negative attitudes toward the future on the ZTPI.”
The Relationship of Time Perspective to Age, Gender, and Academic Achievement among Academically Talented Adolescents (2006, background): “However, exploratory factor analyses of the structure of ZTPI scores with academically talented adolescents (see Worrell & Mello, 2005) yielded a six-factor version.”
Development and Construct Validation of the Swedish Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory (2011, result): “These analyses were consistent with Worrell and Mello (2007) in that a five-factor solution provided the best fit, but that the model was only acceptable.”