Humor and group effectiveness
By Eric J. Romero, A. Pescosolido. 2008
234 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1deb6fffdbabaf73ecef840c274abaf3c940a9d4
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Social Psychology
- C. Robert
- B. Marentette
- D. Glew
- Jessica Mesmer-Magnus
- Suzanne T. Bell
- C. Viswesvaran
- J. Wilbanks
- Terje Slåtten
Citations in the corpus
- Supervisor Humor and Employee Outcomes: The Role of Social Distance and Affective Trust in Supervisor (2015, unknown): “The role of humor in the workplace has received increasing interest among management and social psychology researchers (Cann et al. 2009; Gkorezis et al. 2011; Martin 2007; McGee and Shevlin 2009; Mesmer-Magnus et al. 2012; Romero and Pescosolido 2008).”
- The Wheel Model of humor: Humor events and affect in organizations (2012, background): “Humor use in groups might impact group effectiveness through its ability to create strong groups with shared ‘collective cognitions’ (Romero and Pescosolido, 2008).”
- Team viability for long-term and ongoing organizational teams (2011, background): “Some researchers based their definition on Hackman’s (1987) or Sundstrom et al.’s (1990) conceptualizations (Phillips, 2001; Romero & Pescosolido, 2008), while others added components to the definition (e.g., Aubé & Rousseau, 2005; Balkundi & Harrison, 2006), or created their own (e.g., West,…”
- Empowering leadership and the influence of a humorous work climate on service employees' creativity and innovative behaviour in frontline service jobs (2011, background): “Moreover, it seems that the literature most often has studied humour in relationship to team or group effectiveness ( Romero and Pescosolido, 2008”
- A meta‐analysis of positive humor in the workplace (2012, background): “Indeed, organizations that have incorporated measures of humor within their selection systems have reported impressive results (e.g. Cooper, 2008; Romero and Pescosolido, 2008).”