Team viability for long-term and ongoing organizational teams
By Suzanne T. Bell, B. Marentette. 2011
103 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7295e0132e13fec10dd10e6689952652c84ab16d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management Science and Operations Research
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Federico Aime
- Sabine Sonnentag
- Arnold B. Bakker
- C. Fritz
- Evangelia Demerouti
- Ulla Kinnunen *
- Sharon K. Parker
- Wilmar B. Schaufeli
In Social Psychology
- Federico Aime
- Sabine Sonnentag
- Arnold B. Bakker
- C. Fritz
- Evangelia Demerouti
- Ulla Kinnunen *
- Sharon K. Parker
- Wilmar B. Schaufeli
Citations in the corpus
- Time in organizational research: Catching up on a long neglected topic in order to improve theory (2012, background): “Another way to stress the time perspective in theory development was followed by Bell and Marentette (2011). They refined team viability – a construct that itself is closely linked to the notion of time.”
- The riddle of heterarchy: : power transitions in cross-functional teams (2014, background): “…are being properly utilized within a team (i.e., they are given the opportunity to express power when situationally relevant), they are likely to feel more valued in their role (Humphrey, Nahrgang, & Morgeson, 2007) and thus want to continue to work with the team (Bell & Marentette, 2011).”