From Guilford to Creative Synergy: Opening the Black Box of Team-Level Creativity
By Terri R. Kurtzberg, Teresa M. Amabile. 2001
444 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Mechanical Engineering, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1cc3a436aa2131310912107b755db97653a9ecaa
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Jing Zhou
- Christina E. Shalley
- Markus Baer
- I. Hoever
- Tae-Yeol Kim
- Greg R. Oldham
- T. Egan
- Brent D. Rosso
In Mechanical Engineering
- Christina E. Shalley
- Michael D. Mumford
- Terri R. Kurtzberg
- Jing Zhou
- T. Egan
- Greg R. Oldham
- Markus Baer
- Jan van den Ende
In Social Psychology
- Jing Zhou
- Christina E. Shalley
- D. van Knippenberg
- I. Hoever
- Markus Baer
- T. Egan
- Tae-Yeol Kim
- Greg R. Oldham
Citations in the corpus
- Does transactional leadership count for team innovativeness (2011, background): “When team members have more positive generalized beliefs about their abilities, they tend to work hard and persist in the face of challenge ( Kurtzberg and Amabile, 2001”
- Motivational Differences Across Post-Acceptance Information System Usage Behaviors: An Investigation in the Business Intelligence Systems Context (2013, background): “Additionally, curious individuals are generally excited about devoting effort to learning and exploring, and an extensive knowledge base is one of the critical steps leading to innovation (Greif and Keller 1990, Kurtzberg and Amabile 2001) (IMkw).”
- Factors Influencing Individual Creativity in the Workplace: An Examination of Quantitative Empirical Research (2005, background): “In response to the lack of research on creativity and teamwork, Kurtzberg and Amabile (2001) developed a rationale and research agenda that encouraged further exploration.”
- Can Traditional Divergent Thinking Tests Be Trusted in Measuring and Predicting Real-World Creativity? (2011, background): “Guildford's ( 1950 ) historical presidential address to the American Psychological Association motivated researchers to study this abstruse topic and inspired the now-thriving research field of creativity (Kurtzberg & Amabile, 2000–2001 ).”
- Deepening our understanding of creativity in the workplace: A review of different approaches to creativity research. (2011, background): “Despite the recognized importance of understanding team cognition as it relates to team creativity (Kurtzberg & Amabile, 2001), there has been very little work in this area.”
- Feeling Creative, Being Creative: An Empirical Study of Diversity and Creativity in Teams (2005, background): “The developing body of literature on group-level creativity largely recognizes the theoretical importance of team-member interactions (Kurtzberg & Amabile, 2001; Paulus et al., 2001; Perry-Smith & Shalley, 2003) but, in terms of measurement, tends to rely primarily on traditional quantitative…”
- Superman or the Fantastic Four? Knowledge Combination and Experience in Innovative Teams (2006, background): “It has been argued that communication in large groups has a process cost that reduces group outputs (Kurtzberg & Amabile, 2001; Steiner, 1972).”
- Intrinsic Motivation and Creativity Related to Product: A Meta-analysis of the Studies Published Between 1990–2010 (2013, background): “…pointed out the relationship between motivation and creativity in different areas and at different levels of analysis (e.g., Amabile et al., 1994; Kurtzberg & Amabile, 2001) and some incipient meta-analytically efforts identified a positive relationship between intrinsic motivation and creative…”
- Creativity in the Context of Team Diversity: Team Leader Perspectives (2005, background): “Kurtzberg and Amabile (2001) have stressed that creativity as a result of teamwork be recognized as essential, and have also pointed to team diversity as a crucial focal point for creativity researchers.”
- The Organizational Life of an Idea: Integrating Social Network, Creativity and Decision-Making Perspectives (2007, methodology): “In developing our framework we apply insights from creativity (Kurtzberg and Amabile, 2001; Lubart, 2001; Woodman et al., 1993) and behavioural decision-making literature (Daft and Lengel, 1986; Smith et al., 1994; © Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2007 Weick, 1995).”
- Cognitive Team Diversity and Individual Team Member Creativity: A Cross-Level Interaction (2012, background): “Indeed, previous studies suggest that cognitive diversity (often resulting from functional diversity ) is positively related to creative performance (Jackson et al., 2003; Kurtzberg & Amabile, 2001; Perry-Smith & Shalley, 2003).”