Feeling Creative, Being Creative: An Empirical Study of Diversity and Creativity in Teams
By Terri R. Kurtzberg. 2005
230 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e89cd0342c077ef792e17942b5448505ac1c72c7
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Jing Zhou
- Markus Baer
- I. Hoever
- Tae-Yeol Kim
- Deog-Ro Lee
- Greg R. Oldham
- D. van Knippenberg
- H. Zacher
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Markus Baer
- Jing Zhou
- Tae-Yeol Kim
- I. Hoever
- Deog-Ro Lee
- Greg R. Oldham
- H. Zacher
- D. van Knippenberg
In Social Psychology
- Jing Zhou
- I. Hoever
- Tae-Yeol Kim
- D. van Knippenberg
- Markus Baer
- Greg R. Oldham
- Deog-Ro Lee
- Jennifer S. Mueller
Citations in the corpus
- Openness to Experience and Team Creativity: Effects of Knowledge Sharing and Transformational Leadership (2019, background): “On the other hand, homogeneity can generate cohesion and attractiveness; heterogeneity is conducive to conflict and creativity (Kirschenbaum & Reis, 1997; Kurtzberg, 2005; Rubenson & Runco, 1995).”
- Cognitive diversity and team creativity: Effects of team intrinsic motivation and transformational leadership (2016, background): “, the problemsolving approach) (Kurtzberg, 2005) or on their assigned functional roles in the experiment (e.”
- Creativity and Constraints: Exploring the Role of Constraints in the Creative Processes of Research and Development Teams (2014, background): “Creativity is a key precursor to innovation, which is the successful implementation of creative ideas (Amabile, 1996; Kurtzberg, 2005; West, 1997, 2002).”
- Individual ambidexterity: the duality of exploration and exploitation and its relationship with innovative performance (2017, background): “…al., 2000; Shalley et al., 2009), and employees’ self-perceptions of innovative performance may be important in their own right (e.g., as an indicator of creative self-efficacy; Kurtzberg, 2005), future research should try to include more than one source of information about innovative performance.”
- Emotional intelligence and counterpart mood induction in a negotiation (2006, methodology): “Participants engaged in a two-party labor-management negotiation simulation that has been used in previous research (Bayazit and Mannix, 2003; Kurtzberg, 2005); case developed by Valley and Medvec (1996).”
- The Personality Composition of Teams and Creativity: The Moderating Role of Team Creative Confidence (2008, background): “Although teams with certain personality compositions may have the potential to exhibit high levels of creativity (Driskell et al., 1987; Kurtzberg, 2005), previous theory suggests that such compositional benefits may only result in creative synergies when team members engage in collective idea…”
- Different Strokes for Different Teams: The Contingent Effects of Positive and Negative Feedback on the Creativity of Informationally Homogeneous and Diverse Teams (2017, background): “Creativity judgments are inherently subjective and self- and other-rated creativity have been found to diverge (Kurtzberg, 2005) suggesting that one’s own creativity”