The impact of job performance on employee turnover intentions and the voluntary turnover process A meta-analysis and path model
By Ryan D. Zimmerman, Todd C. Darnold. 2009
275 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1b6757a8e84472f570ff990534c12eb5be53e21d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- İlhami Yücel
- Corine Boon
- Murray R. Barrick
- Ryan D. Zimmerman
- Terje Slåtten
- Göran Svensson
- Sander Sværi
- Michal Biron
In Sociology and Political Science
- İlhami Yücel
- Corine Boon
- Murray R. Barrick
- Sander Sværi
- Göran Svensson
- Terje Slåtten
- Michal Biron
- Thurasamy Ramayah
Citations in the corpus
- Hiring for retention and performance (2009, methodology): “A meta-analysis by Zimmerman and Darnold (2009) indicated a negative relationship between intent to quit and job performance ( = −.14).”
- Service quality and turnover intentions as perceived by employees (2011, methodology): “Previous research has focused on this topic (e.g. Lee et al., 2005; Griffeth et al., 2000; Zimmerman and Darnold, 2009).”
- Performance and turnover intentions: a social exchange perspective (2013, background): “Whereas studies have examined internal/system and external/labor market moderators (Allen and Griffeth, 1999; Nyberg, 2010; Zimmerman and Darnold, 2009), we employ notions from social exchange theory to generate hypotheses about the moderating role of employees’ relations with their supervisor and c”
- On passion and heavy work investment: personal and organizational outcomes (2013, background): “Work satisfaction is an important determinant of turnover intentions (see Hom et al., 1992): it is negatively related to turnover intentions and actual turnover (e.g. Griffeth et al., 2000; Tett and Meyer, 1993; Zimmerman and Darnold, 2009).”
- THE REVOLVING DOOR: A CLOSER LOOK AT MAJOR FACTORS IN VOLUNTEERS’ INTENTION TO QUIT (2013, background): “Newer studies have shown that job performance, through negative feedback during performance appraisals, impacts employee intentions to quit (Zimmerman & Darnold, 2009), as well as adverse working conditions (Böckerman & Ilmakunnas, 2009).”
- Transformational Leadership and Turnover Intentions: The Mediating Role of Employee Performance during the COVID-19 Pandemic (2021, background): “As performance supervisory reviews were more linked to the plan to withdraw (Zimmerman and Darnold 2009) and as self-rated performances and managerial ratings have been negatively connected to turnover intentions (Biron and Boon 2013), the performance of employees would negatively predict turnover…”
- Quality of Work Life and Turnover Intention: A Partial Least Square (PLS) Approach (2013, background): “Consistently, turnover was found to be significantly related to lower productivity, profit and reduction in job performance (Firth et al. 2004; Larkin 1995; Roth and Roth 1995; Zimmerman and Darnold 2009).”
- Developing Attitudes Toward an Entrepreneurial Career Through Mentoring (2015, background): “Furthermore, research indicates that self-efficacy also positively affects job performance (Robertson & Sadri, 1993) and career retention (Zimmerman & Darnold, 2009).”
- Resolution, Relief, and Resignation: A Qualitative Study of Responses to Misfit at Work (2017, unknown): “Sometimes, even leaving a position or organization is beneficial to the person and the organization (Zimmerman & Darnold, 2009).”