Fitting into the stereotype: How gender-stereotyped perceptions of prototypic peers relate to liking for school subjects
By Ursula Kessels. 2005
195 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Gender Studies, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/19c607027728008fe184b48d6ee7a265d696ca21
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Ursula Kessels
- Christine R. Starr
- M. Hofer
- Ann Renninger
- K. Ann Renninger
- Rachael D. Robnett
- C. Leaper
- Ruurd Taconis
In Gender Studies
- Ursula Kessels
- Denise Sekaquaptewa
- Nilanjana Dasgupta
- Rachael D. Robnett
- Diana E. Betz
- Ruurd Taconis
- Daryl W. Kinney
- M. Hofer
In Social Psychology
- Ursula Kessels
- Ruurd Taconis
- Denise Sekaquaptewa
- Rachael D. Robnett
- Ann Renninger
- M. Hofer
- Christine R. Starr
- S. Russell
Citations in the corpus
- Adolescents’ Development of Individual Interests: A Product of Multiple Goal Regulation? (2010, background): “The phenomenon of self-to-prototype matching has been studied especially with regard to school subjects (Hannover & Kessels, 2004; Kessels, 2005).”
- Gender Bias in STEM Fields (2016, background): “…the high school level, some evidence suggests that male peers are the most common source of gender bias (Leaper & Brown, 2008), but there is also evidence of bias originating from female peers, teachers, and other adults (Breakwell, Vignoles, & Robertson, 2003; Kessels, 2005; Leaper & Brown, 2008).”
- The development of academic procrastination in first-year secondary education students: The link with metacognitive self-regulation, self-efficacy, and effort regulation (2018, background): “Moreover, task preferences, such as the preference for a certain school subject, might be influenced by students' gender (Kessels, 2005).”
- Helping and Hindering Undergraduate Women’s STEM Motivation: Experiences With STEM Encouragement, STEM-Related Gender Bias, and Sexual Harassment (2018, background): “Studies conducted in Germany, Canada, and Israel similarly found that negative peer reactions to adolescent girls in science were related to lowered motivation (Boehnke, 2008; Kessels, 2005).”
- Interest and Identity Development in Instruction: An Inductive Model (2009, background): “The prototype of physics is that it is masculine and more difficult than other subjects; success in physics is also considered to be unrelated to the amount of work invested in learning it (Hannover & Kessels, 2004; Kessels, 2005; Kessels, Rau, & Hannover, 2006).”
- Ingroup Experts and Peers as Social Vaccines Who Inoculate the Self-Concept: The Stereotype Inoculation Model (2011, background): “Carter, 1987; Eaton, Mitchell, & Jolley, 1991 ; Kessels, 2005 ).”
- How gender differences in academic engagement relate to students’ gender identity (2014, background): “Kessels (2005) found that the more similarly girls described themselves to the ‘typical student liking physics best’ (using scales measuring femininity and masculinity), the more they reported liking physics themselves.”
- How Choosing Science depends on Students' Individual Fit to ‘Science Culture’ (2009, methodology): “In a second step, the present study set out to test not only whether the self-toprototype theory is a useful tool for predicting the liking of different school subjects (Hannover & Kessels, 2004; Kessels, 2005) and the wish to pursue a career in different fields (Kessels & Hannover, 2002), but also ”
- Why don't young people want to become engineers? Rational reasons for disappointing decisions (2010, background): “Kessels 2005 , Taconis 2008 , Grasle 2009 , Sjoberg 2010 ).”
- Relations Among Gender Typicality, Peer Relations, and Mental Health During Early Adolescence (2014, background): “In addition, Kessels (2005) found that boys rated gender atypical hypothetical peers (e.g., girls who excelled in physics) as less popular than gender typical peers.”
- The Grass Is Greener in Non-Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math Classes (2014, unknown): “…Steele, & Gross, 2007; Smith et al., 2013; Thoman, Smith, Brown, Chase, & Lee, 2013) or perceived incompatibility between a feminine social identity role and the masculine domain stereotype (Brown & Diekman, 2010; Cheryan & Plaut, 2010; Diekman, Brown, Johnston, & Clark, 2010; Kessels, 2005).”
- Selected Nonmusic Predictors of Urban Students’ Decisions to Enroll and Persist in Middle School Band Programs (2010, background): “Indeed, some research has found that males hold gender-stereotyped perceptions regarding music classes, where participation in music is viewed negatively because it is regarded as feminine (Kessels, 2005).”
- Mathematics Interest and Achievement: What Role Do Perceived Parent and Teacher Support Play? A Longitudinal Analysis (2013, unknown): “Peers are important communicators of sex-role norms and particularly among girls counter-stereotypical achievement profiles lead to feelings of social exclusion and unpopularity (Kessels, 2005).”
- Connecting High School Physics Experiences, Outcome Expectations, Physics Identity, and Physics Career Choice: A Gender Study. (2010, unknown): “Unfortunately, parents and peers have frequently been found to hold gender stereotypes favoring males when considering males ’ and females ’ abilities in science and mathematics (Andre, Whigham, Hendrickson, & Chambers, 1999; Bleeker & Jacobs, 2004; Farenga & Joyce, 1999; Kessels, 2005).”
- Gender-nonconforming lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender youth: school victimization and young adult psychosocial adjustment. (2010, background): “Kessels, U. (2005). Fitting into the stereotype: How gender-stereotyped perceptions of prototypic peers relate to liking for school subjects.”
- Gendered study choice: a literature review. A review of theory and research into the unequal representation of male and female students in mathematics, science, and technology (2013, background): “Research has also shown that boys and girls use peers to evaluate their own achievement and occupational aspirations and that peers reinforce gender stereotypical behaviour and punish non-conformity (Hannover & Kessels, 2004; Kessels, 2005; Young et al., 1999).”