Denise Sekaquaptewa

Sociology and Political Science · 2002–2013

A researcher in the Science corpus: 9 papers; trusts 38 researchers and is trusted by 30 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Sociology and Political Science — 100 citations into it; #1,794 of 22,756 by trust here, #1,846 by citations
• Social Psychology — 67 citations into it
• Gender Studies — 47 citations into it; #253 of 4,924 by trust here, #241 by citations
• Experimental and Cognitive Psychology — 44 citations into it; #7,192 of 9,731 by trust here, #4,061 by citations
• Applied Psychology — 22 citations into it
• Safety Research — 18 citations into it; #5,305 of 5,829 by trust here, #2,596 by citations
• Cognitive Science & Psychology — 9 citations into it; #544 of 582 by trust here, #241 by citations
• Developmental and Educational Psychology — 8 citations into it; #7,508 of 8,223 by trust here, #4,815 by citations

Whom Denise Sekaquaptewa trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. A. Greenwald
2. Nilanjana Dasgupta
3. S. Spencer
4. T. Schmader
5. D. Quinn
6. C. Steele
7. Brian A. Nosek
8. Mahzarin R. Banaji
9. Michael Inzlicht
10. S. Asgari

Who trusts Denise Sekaquaptewa overall

1. Michael Inzlicht
2. T. Schmader
3. Sapna Cheryan
4. Nilanjana Dasgupta
5. Jenessa R. Shapiro
6. C. Good
7. Crystal L. Hoyt
8. Michael Johns
9. B. Major
10. Camiel J. Beukeboom

Papers from Denise Sekaquaptewa's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Denise Sekaquaptewa trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test.
2. Implicit social cognition: attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes.
3. Female Role Models: Protecting Women’s Math Test Performance
4. A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept. (Psychology Review)
5. On the malleability of automatic attitudes: combating automatic prejudice with images of admired and disliked individuals. (Journal of Personality and Social Psychology)
6. A Threatening Intellectual Environment: Why Females Are Susceptible to Experiencing Problem-Solving Deficits in the Presence of Males (Psychology Science)
7. STEMing the tide: using ingroup experts to inoculate women's self-concept in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). (Journal of Personality and Social Psychology)
8. Relations among the Implicit Association Test, Discriminatory Behavior, and Explicit Measures of Racial Attitudes
9. Math = male, me = female, therefore math ≠ me.
10. Ambient belonging: how stereotypical cues impact gender participation in computer science. (Journal of Personality and Social Psychology)

Their papers

• Solo status, stereotype threat, and performance expectancies: Their effects on women’s performance (2003) — 403 citations
• Implicit stereotypes and women's math performance : How implicit gender-math stereotypes influence women's susceptibility to stereotype threat (2007) — 63 citations
• The Differential Effects of Solo Status on Members of High- and Low-Status Groups (2002) — 203 citations
• Stereotypic explanatory bias: Implicit stereotyping as a predictor of discrimination (2003) — 172 citations
• When being different is detrimental: Solo status and the performance of women and racial minorities (2002) — 147 citations
• The effects of an academic environment intervention on science identification among women in STEM (2013) — 147 citations
• The Influence of Gender Stereotypes on Role Adoption in Student Teams (2013) — 88 citations
• My Fair Physicist? Feminine Math and Science Role Models Demotivate Young Girls (2012) — 178 citations
• Implicit stereotypes and women ’ s math performance : How implicit gender-math stereotypes in X uence women ’ s susceptibility to stereotype threat (2005)