Motivated Reasoning: A Depth-of-Processing Perspective
By Shailendra P. Jain, Durairaj Maheswaran. 2000
225 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, General Decision Sciences, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0eb7443589231fc01d896117ada854b93dc53742
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Nidhi Agrawal
- H. Unnava
- N. Montgomery
- Sekar Kidambi Raju
- Durairaj Maheswaran
- D. H. Dean
- D. Dunning
- John Th⊘gersen
In General Decision Sciences
- Nidhi Agrawal
- H. Unnava
- N. Montgomery
- Sekar Kidambi Raju
- Durairaj Maheswaran
- D. Dunning
- John Th⊘gersen
- D. H. Dean
In Sociology and Political Science
- Nidhi Agrawal
- Durairaj Maheswaran
- H. Unnava
- N. Montgomery
- Sekar Kidambi Raju
- John Th⊘gersen
- D. Dunning
- Hye Jin Yoon
Citations in the corpus
- Self-Image Motives and Consumer Behavior: How Sacrosanct Self-Beliefs Sway Preferences in the Marketplace (2007, background): “For example, Jain and Maheswaran (2000) nudged participants to prefer one brand of telephone answering machine over another equally priced answering machine, and then gave them a consumer survey showing either that their preferred brand performed better than the alternative option or that it…”
- Green Shopping (2011, background): “…documenting that individuals have a strong tendency to selectively attend to, scrutinize, and process information in a way that bolsters their previously formed attitudes and justifies past behaviors (Abelson, 1959; Aronson, 1969; Jain & Maheswaran, 2000; Kunda, 1990; Lord, Ross, & Lepper, 1979).”
- Consumer Reaction to Negative Publicity (2004, background): “Whatever the label, this research suggests that consumers are motivated to engage in the biased processing of new information to yield preferred conclusions (Jain & Maheswaran, 2000).”
- The Influence of Consumers’ Lay Theories on Approach/Avoidance Motivation (2009, background): “Jain and Maheswaran (2000) also consider motivated processing a form of extensive elaboration.”
- Understanding schema incongruity as a process in advertising: Review and future recommendations (2013, background): “In such cases, counterargument, avoidance, and negative attitudes toward the incongruity and the brand may result (Jain and Maheswaran 2000 ).”
- Navigating by the Stars: Investigating the Actual and Perceived Validity of Online User Ratings (2016, background): “Consumers may also engage in motivated reasoning to justify buying certain kinds of products such as those that are expensive or those made by a favored brand (Jain and Maheswaran 2000; Kunda 1990).”
- Capitalizing on Content: Information Adoption in Two Online communities (2008, background): “Resolving inconsistencies between newly received information and previously held understandings and beliefs is a difficult cognitive task (Abelson, 1983) that entails systematic processing (Jain and Maheswaran, 2000, Sengupta and Johar, 2002).”
- The Moderating Effect of Brand Commitment on the Evaluation of Competitive Brands (2009, methodology): “Other researchers have found that irrespective of the strength of the arguments used, consumers committed to a brand seem to be equally opposed to a preference-inconsistent option (e.g., Jain 2003; Jain and Maheswaran 2000).”