Green Shopping
By John Th⊘gersen. 2011
141 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Marketing, Plant Science, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9959c82887d6837e02da7ac85f71c9e4236c4592
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Marketing
- G. Schuitema
- J. Carlson
- Darrel D. Muehling
- Ana Fernández-Sainz
- M. Vicente-Molina
- J. Izagirre-Olaizola
- Ioannis Kareklas
- J. D. de Groot
In Plant Science
- J. Carlson
- Darrel D. Muehling
- Ana Fernández-Sainz
- M. Vicente-Molina
- J. Izagirre-Olaizola
- G. Schuitema
- Ioannis Kareklas
- J. D. de Groot
In Social Psychology
- G. Schuitema
- J. Carlson
- Darrel D. Muehling
- Ana Fernández-Sainz
- M. Vicente-Molina
- J. Izagirre-Olaizola
- Ioannis Kareklas
- J. D. de Groot
Citations in the corpus
- The Role of Regulatory Focus and Self-View in “Green” Advertising Message Framing (2012, background): “In interpreting these findings, Thøgersen (2011) postulated that they are indicative of the fact that green consumers are not only driven by selfishness (as is often presumed), but are motivated to help solve environmental problems as well.”
- Understanding the antecedents of consumers' attitudes towards doggy bags in restaurants: Concern about food waste, culture, norms and emotions (2017, background): “Consumers have become more health and environment conscious (i.e. Thøgersen, 2011; Klöckner, 2013), more concerned about where their food comes from (Dowd and Burke, 2013) and about food waste (Evans, 2012).”
- “I Eat Organic for My Benefit and Yours”: Egoistic and Altruistic Considerations for Purchasing Organic Food and Their Implications for Advertising Strategists (2014, background): “…to organic food attitudes and purchase intentions (Ahmad and Juhdi 2010; Hughner et al. 2007; Magnusson et al. 2003; Michaelidou and Hassan 2008; Thøgersen 2011), to our knowledge, ours is the first empirical investigation to explore the relative impact of both considerations simultaneously by…”
- Green consumerism: the influence of product attributes and values on purchasing intentions (2015, background): “As shown in value research, individuals who strongly endorse biospheric values are more likely to cooperate in social dilemmas,while peoplewho strongly endorse egoistic values will bemore likely to deflect in social dilemmas (Thøgersen, 2011).”
- Internal determinants of recycling behaviour by university students: a cross‐country comparative analysis (2015, background): “Pro-environmental behaviour is positively related to unselfish or altruistic values (Thøgersen, 2011).”