Reading Fluency and Its Intervention

By Maryanne Wolf, Tami Katzir-Cohen. 2001

707 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0e30ce8f8f2605c452ecfb14b0e8883afc3dae70

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Statistics and Probability

Citations in the corpus

Developmental changes in the nature of language proficiency and reading fluency paint a more complex view of reading comprehension in ELL and EL1 (2012, background): “There is general agreement that while fluent reading of isolated words may be less dependent on higher level language skills, fluent reading of connected text is more closely linked to language skills ( Wolf & Katzir-Cohen, 2001 ).”
Rapid automatized naming (RAN) and reading fluency: implications for understanding and treatment of reading disabilities. (2012, background): “…which all sublexical units, words, and connected text and all the perceptual, linguistic , and cognitive processes involved in each level are processed accurately and automatically so that sufficient time and resources can be allocated to comprehension and deeper thought (Wolf & Katzir-Cohen 2001).”
Decoding and Fluency: Foundation Skills for Struggling Older Readers (2003, background): “Recently, it has been argued that fluency refers to automaticity in all processes used while reading (Wolf & Katzir-Cohen, 2001).”
Exploring relationships between oral reading fluency and reading comprehension amongst English second language readers in South Africa (2016, background): “The relationship obtains across schools serving children from different socioeconomic backgrounds or instructional programmes, and can be found in children without reading difficulties as well as those with learning disabilities (Deno, Fuchs, Marston, & Shin 2001; Wolf & Katzir-Cohen, 2001).”
Contrasting the Effectiveness of Fluency Interventions for Students with or at Risk for Learning Disabilities: A Multilevel Random Coefficient Modeling Meta–Analysis (2006, background): “Electronic inquiries may be sent to paulmorgan@psu.edu. to speciﬁcally target ﬂuency (Wolf & Katzir-Cohen, 2001).”
Predictive Validity of Early Literacy Indicators From the Middle of Kindergarten to Second Grade (2009, background): “Phonological awareness, alphabetic understanding, and automaticity in sublexical skills facilitate movement through the alphabetic phases of reading development (Torgesen et al., 2001; Wolf & Bowers, 1999; Wolf & Katzir-Cohen, 2001).”
The Complex Nature of Reading Fluency: A Multidimensional View (2008, background): “When thinking about the components of a definition of reading fluency, we are reminded of this statement by Wolf and Katzir-Cohen ( 2001 ): ”
Revisiting assumptions about the relationship of fluent reading to comprehension: Spanish-speakers’ text-reading fluency in English (2010, background): “Although reading fluency is often defined and measured simply by the speed and accuracy of reading isolated words, many researchers argue that a more complex conceptualization is necessary in which fluency is understood in terms of its components (e.g., Breznitz, 2006; Perfetti, 1985, 1995, 2007; W”