An Examination of the Cross-Cultural Validity of a Multidimensional Model of Commitment in Europe

By Christian Vandenberghe, Florence Stinglhamber, Kathleen Bentein, Tania Delhaise. 2001

114 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0db4d15ad30c980a8d39fe1b1eb4e85e09353818

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Citations in the corpus

The relationship between multiple commitments and organizational citizenship behavior in Arab and Jewish culture (2006, background): “This model is considered the most popular measure of cultural values, also holding great promise as a theoretical framework to guide cross-cultural comparisons of organizational commitment (Clugston et al., 2000; Kirkman & Shapiro, 2001; Randall, 1993) as well as commitment to other foci ( Vandenber”
An Examination of the Relationship Between Commitments and Culture Among Five Cultural Groups of Israeli Teachers (2007, background): “This model is considered the most widely cited work on culture developed for the study of organizations (Erez & Earley, 1993) and serves as a theoretical framework to guide cross-cultural comparisons of organizational commitment (Clugston et al., 2000; Randall, 1993) and commitment to other foci ( V”
Enhancing the online decision-making process by using augmented reality: A two country comparison of youth markets (2017, methodology): “…2016) was used to test for measurement invariance, i.e. whether the scales measure the same constructs across the Italian and German sample, which legitimizes a cross-cultural comparison (Milfont and Fischer, 2015; Schaffer and Riordan, 2003; Vandenberg and Lance, 2000; Vandenberghe et al., 2001).”
Meyer and Allen Model of Organizational Commitment: Measurement Issues (2007, background): “…p. 306) note that the meta-analytic correlations between the ACS and measures of Job Satisfaction (JS) are greater than the correlations between the ACS and the CCS and between the ACS and NCS, implying that AC is more closely related to JS than to the other Meyer/Allen commitment constructs.”
Organizational Commitment Profiles and Job Satisfaction among Greek Private and Public Sector Employees (2007, background): “However the approach to employment in the two sectors in Greece differs markedly from the pattern normally expected in Western European countries, which is also discussed.”
A quarter century of Culture's Consequences: a review of empirical research incorporating Hofstede's cultural values framework (2006, background): “, 1995) and turnover intentions (Vandenberghe et al., 2001) is due to the overall difficulty of detecting moderators (McClelland and Judd, 1993), using country scores instead”
Individual correlates of organizational commitment and intention to leave the organization (2007, background): “But this does not necessarily lead to higher commitment as in other Western countries ( Vanderberghe et al. , 2001”
Employee commitment and motivation: a conceptual analysis and integrative model. (2004, background): “Indeed, there is now considerable evidence that multiple workplace commitments can influence employee behavior (e.g., T. E. Becker & Billings, 1993; Siders, George, & Sharwadkar, 2001; Vandenberghe et al., 2001).”
Cross-cultural organizational behavior. (2007, background): “Research has demonstrated that existing measures of organizational commitment (OC) have construct validity in numerous European countries (e.g., Vandenberghe et al. 2001), yet others have questioned the factor validity of OC measures, particularly in East Asian samples (e.g., Ko et al. 1997).”