Engaging leadership in the job demands-resources model
By Wilmar B. Schaufeli. 2015
411 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: General Health Professions, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0b34125ec614e85af6b09b2f719d5ab11910b6fb
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In General Health Professions
- J. Hakanen
- Wilmar B. Schaufeli
- G. Notelaers
- Hans De Witte
- Andrea Fischbach
- Marjolein C. J. Caniëls
- Philipp Wolfgang Lichtenthaler
- Lotta K. Harju
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- J. Hakanen
- Wilmar B. Schaufeli
- T. Beehr
- Minseop Kim
- G. Notelaers
- Arnold B. Bakker
- Marjolein C. J. Caniëls
- Andrea Fischbach
In Social Psychology
- J. Hakanen
- T. Beehr
- Marjolein C. J. Caniëls
- Minseop Kim
- Wilmar B. Schaufeli
- G. Notelaers
- Andrea Fischbach
- Anouk Decuypere
Citations in the corpus
- Leadership, job crafting, and employee health and performance (2018, background): “hindering job demands because employee-oriented leaders decrease hindering job demands (Schaufeli, 2015; Tuckey et al., 2012), which reduces employees’ necessity for preventionfocused job crafting.”
- Engaging leader – Engaged employees? A cross-lagged study on employee engagement (2019, methodology): “Considering that engaging leadership seems to operate as one overarching (i.e. second-order) concept (see Schaufeli, 2015) with three underlying, closely related dimensions (i.e. inspirational, strengthening and connecting leadership), we hypothesise that relationships evolve from engaging…”
- Basic psychological need satisfaction mediates the relationship between engaging leadership and work engagement: A cross‐national study (2019, methodology): “The 12-item Engaging Leadership scale (Schaufeli, 2015) assesses the four core dimensions of engaging leadership, namely strengthening, connecting, empowering, and inspiring with three items each.”
- Can job crafting reduce job boredom and increase work engagement? A three-year cross-lagged panel study (2016, positive): “Challenging tasks foster experiences of competence and mastery, which sustain psychological well-being (Sulea, Van Beek, Sarbescu, Virgae, & Schaufeli, 2015; Pekrun, Elliot, & Maier, 2009).”
- EMPLOYEE RESILIENCE: DIRECTIONS FOR RESILIENCE DEVELOPMENT (2017, background): “…proactive behaviors, modeling and supporting change adaptability, and fostering a learning stance (Elkington & Booysen, 2015; Jundt et al., 2015; Schaufeli, 2015; Solberg & Wong, 2016; Uhl-Bien & Arena, T hi s do cu m en t is co py ri gh te d by th e A m er ic an Ps yc ho lo gi ca l A ss oc…”
- Mind the mindset! The interaction of proactive personality, transformational leadership and growth mindset for engagement at work (2018, background): “In the context of the present study, we argue that “engaging leadership” is of particular interest (Schaufeli, 2015).”
- Can Empowering Leaders Affect Subordinates’ Well-Being and Careers Because They Encourage Subordinates’ Job Crafting Behaviors? (2018, background): “Some studies suggest that a leader could play a role in determining the possibilities for subordinates’ job crafting behaviors and increasing their job resources (Schaufeli, 2015; Wrzesniewski & Dutton, 2001).”
- Exploring the Job Demands–Resources Model of Work Engagement in Government: Bringing in a Psychological Perspective (2017, methodology): “Finally, work engagement is often analyzed as a mediating variable between the JD-R model and outcomes (Schaufeli, 2015).”
- Leadership and work engagement: Exploring explanatory mechanisms (2020, background): “Moreover, positive leadership styles have been shown to enhance employees’ engagement not only directly but also indirectly through increasing job resources and decreasing job demands (Schaufeli, 2015; Schaufeli and Bakker, 2004).”