Self-Determination as a Moderator of Demands and Control: Implications for Employee Strain and Engagement.
By Stacey L. Parker, N. Jimmieson, Catherine E. Amiot. 2010
114 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: General Health Professions, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/04de0721b1657fc87568242add07f96f52081849
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In General Health Professions
- A. van den Broeck
- Claude Fernet
- Stéphanie Austin
- Hans De Witte
- Sarah-Geneviève Trépanier
- B. Schreurs
- Maarten Vansteenkiste
- Christian Vandenberghe
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Claude Fernet
- Stéphanie Austin
- A. van den Broeck
- Marylène Gagné
- Hans De Witte
- Sarah-Geneviève Trépanier
- Wilmar B. Schaufeli
- Maarten Vansteenkiste
In Social Psychology
- Claude Fernet
- Stéphanie Austin
- A. van den Broeck
- Marylène Gagné
- Hans De Witte
- Jacques Forest
- Sarah-Geneviève Trépanier
- Maarten Vansteenkiste
Citations in the corpus
- Understanding Workaholics' Motivations: A Self-Determination Perspective (2011, result): “In line with previous research (e.g. Vansteenkiste et al., 2004; Parker et al., 2010), controlled motivation included items such as “because others [partner, parents, friends, . . .] expect me to do so” and “because I have to be good in this job, otherwise I would feel disappointed in myself”.”
- Perceived Organizational Support, Motivation, and Engagement Among Police Officers (2013, background): “Although researchers have started to devote empirical attention to the motivation-engagement relationship in the work context (e.g., Parker et al., 2010), few studies have included both determinants (e.g., organizational support, global motivation) and outcomes (e.g., engagement) of work motivation.”
- Value congruence and teachers’ work engagement: The mediating role of autonomous and controlled motivation (2015, background): “Work engagement is directly influenced by value congruence, autonomous motivation and controlled motivation (Dylag et al., 2013; Meyer & Gagné, 2008; Parker et al., 2010; Sortheix et al., 2013).”
- Examining the inverted U-shaped relationship between workload and innovative work behavior: The role of work engagement and mindfulness (2020, background): “As a result, individuals will likely use available opportunities to cope with an increased workload (Parker et al., 2010).”
- Transformational leadership and optimal functioning at work: On the mediating role of employees' perceived job characteristics and motivation (2015, background): “For example, Parker, Jimmieson, and Amiot (2010) showed that work overload was positively related to controlled motivation, whereas job control was positively related to autonomous motivation.”
- Does an intrinsic work value orientation strengthen the impact of job resources? A perspective from the Job Demands–Resources Model (2011, result): “The results also confirm previous research attesting to the importance of employees’ motivation for job resources to alter the impact of job demands (Fernet et al., 2004; Parker et al., 2010).”
- Procedural Justice and Employee Engagement: Roles of Organizational Identification and Moral Identity Centrality (2013, background): “…of employee engagement for both employees and organizations (Christian et al. 2011; Harter et al. 2002; Rich et al. 2010), it is important to assess whether and how procedural justice motivates employee engagement which is also considered as requiring employee motivation (Parker et al. 2010).”