Understanding Workaholics' Motivations: A Self-Determination Perspective

By A. van den Broeck, B. Schreurs, Hans De Witte, Maarten Vansteenkiste, F. Germeys, Wilmar B. Schaufeli. 2011

183 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5f7988af9932a0d79438e761300585b6ca53f05a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

A resources perspective on when and how proactive work behaviour leads to employee withdrawal (2019, result): “In support of this, Van den Broeck et al. (2011) found that engaging in tasks for external reasons was associated with mental preoccupation with work during free time.”
The effects of work motivation on employee exhaustion and commitment: An extension of the JD-R model (2012, background): “In contrast, controlled motivation has been positively associated with negative consequences for workers, such as workaholism (Van den Broeck et al., 2011), burnout (Fernet, Senécal, Guay, Marsh, & Dowson, 2008), and turnover intention (Richer, Blanchard, & Vallerand, 2002).”
The dualistic model of passion for work: Discriminate and predictive validity with work engagement and workaholism (2015, background): “The motivational underpinning of compulsive work has also been found to be related to controlled motivation (Van den Broeck et al., 2011), the same motivation associated with OP (Przybylski, Weinstein, Ryan, & Rigby, 2009).”
The number of autonomy-supportive relationships : are more relationships better for motivation, perceived competence, and achievement? (2013, background): “Many researchers have classified these types of regulation into two broad categories: autonomous and controlled regulations (Van den Broeck et al., 2011).”
Beyond intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: A meta-analysis on self-determination theory’s multidimensional conceptualization of work motivation (2021, unknown): “The lack of theoretical specification on how external and introjected motivation relate to outcomes has led scholars to pose diverging hypotheses about these relations (e.g., Gagn´e et al., 2015; Van den Broeck et al., 2011).”