The Efficacy of Written Corrective Feedback in Improving L2 Written Accuracy: A Meta‐Analysis

358 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Power of Feedback Revisited: A Meta-Analysis of Educational Feedback Research (2020, neutral): “Miller (2003), Russel and Spada (2006), Truscott (2007), Li (2010), Kang and Han (2015) and Brown (2016) have all similarly noted that the eﬀectiveness of corrective feedback is inﬂuenced by additional moderating variables, such as learners’ proﬁciency, the setting, and the genre of the task (Kang…”
The revision and transfer effects of direct and indirect comprehensive corrective feedback on ESL students’ writing (2018, methodology): “Indeed, in a recent meta-analysis, Kang and Han (2015) found that the efficacy of WCF was influenced greatly by factors such as setting as well as learners’ level of linguistic knowledge.”
The relationship between vocabulary knowledge and L2 reading/listening comprehension: A meta-analysis (2020, result): “The result is consistent with some previous meta-analysis that also found significant impacts of Time on their observed effect sizes (e.g. Kang & Han, 2015).”