Scott Highhouse

Social Psychology · 2002–2018

A researcher in the Science corpus: 12 papers; trusts 16 researchers and is trusted by 57 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Scott Highhouse trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Jose M. Cortina
  2. Filip Lievens
  3. Daniel Kahneman
  4. W. Grove
  5. Cass R. Sunstein
  6. Stephen J. Zaccaro
  7. R. Peterson
  8. Herbert H. Clark
  9. Bonnie Kaplan
  10. Michael A. Shapiro

Who trusts Scott Highhouse overall

  1. Greet van Hoye
  2. Herman Aguinis
  3. Nicolas Roulin
  4. Filip Lievens
  5. Susanne Braun
  6. Berkeley J. Dietvorst
  7. Kyle J. Bradley
  8. Adrian Bangerter
  9. Jerel Slaughter
  10. H. J. Walker

Papers from Scott Highhouse's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Scott Highhouse trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice
  2. Job search and employment: a personality-motivational analysis and meta-analytic review. (Journal of Applied Psychology)
  3. The relationship between early recruitment-related activities and the application decisions of new labor-market entrants: a brand equity approach to recruitment. (Journal of Applied Psychology)
  4. The relation of instrumental and symbolic attributes to a company's attractiveness as an employer.
  5. The incremental validity of interview scores over and above cognitive ability and conscientiousness scores
  6. Maximizing versus satisficing: happiness is a matter of choice. (Journal of Personality and Social Psychology)
  7. On the Use of College Students in Social Science Research: Insights from a Second‐Order Meta‐analysis
  8. A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. (American Psychologist)
  9. Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: The clinical–statistical controversy.
  10. The Construction of Preference: Introspecting About Reasons Can Reduce Post-Choice Satisfaction

Their papers