A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality.
By Daniel Kahneman. American Psychologist, 2003
5,342 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, General Decision Sciences, Philosophy
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5e23b4bc089dc6aa9855e4abdaec172171b03f00
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- K. Stanovich
- Gerd Gigerenzer
- M. Toplak
- Wim De Neys
- Ralph Hertwig
- Joshua D. Greene
- R. F. West
- Bertram Gawronski
In General Decision Sciences
- K. Stanovich
- Jonathan Evans
- A. Glöckner
- Daniel Kahneman
- M. Toplak
- George Loewenstein
- Paul Slovic
- Bertram Gawronski
In Philosophy
- Gordon Pennycook
- Wim De Neys
- Daniel Kahneman
- K. Stanovich
- James D. Grayot
- Marjaana Lindeman
- Erik Dane
- David G. Rand
Citations in the corpus
- : From inference to reasoning: The construction of rationality (2004, background): “Many theorists have suggested that human inferential processes are usefully construed as comprising two fundamental systems (Evans, 2002; Kahneman, 2003; Klaczynski, 2000, 2001, in press; Sloman, 1996; Stanovich, 1999; Stanovich & West, 2000).”
- Multiple Intelligences, the Mozart Effect, and Emotional Intelligence: A Critical Review (2006, background): “Kahneman (2003) concluded that there are two separate decision-making systems in the brain: System 1 generates fast, intuitive, automatic decision making; System 2 generates slow, effortful, consciously monitored decision making.”
- Inadequate Evidence for Multiple Intelligences, Mozart Effect, and Emotional Intelligence Theories (2006, background): “System II operates at the concept level, and System I operates both at the percept and concept level (Kahneman, 2003).”
- In Defense of Consciousness: The Role of Conscious and Unconscious Inputs in Consumer Choice (2005, neutral): “…the notion that automatic (System 1) influences are the default, with relatively infrequent override by conscious (System 2) processes (e.g., Bargh, 1997; Kahneman, 2003), may fit many psychological phenomena but does not adequately describe choice, where System 2 is usually the primary influence.”
- Environmental cognitions, land change, and social–ecological feedbacks: an overview (2013, background): “Preferences may depend on features of the context that should logically be irrelevant (Kahneman 2003; Blume and Easley 2008) or can be time-inconsistent, for example, because of hyperbolic discounting – discount rates that decline over time (Frederick et al.”
- Conflict detection, dual processes, and logical intuitions: Some clarifications (2014, background): “Specifically, many of the classic reasoning problems prompt a response from automatic processes, such as linguistic comprehension, stereotyping, belief-evaluation, and imagery Kahneman, 2003; Stanovich, 2004).”
- Three decades of lay epistemics: The why, how, and who of knowledge formation (2009, background): “…epistemic processes in a variety of paradigms including those concerned with attitude formation and change (e.g., Maio & Haddock, 2007; Petty & Wegener, 1999), impression formation (Brewer, 1988; Fiske & Neuberg, 1990), judgement under uncertainty (Kahneman, 2003), and attribution (Hilton, 2007).”
- Cultural Adaptations to Environmental Variability: An Evolutionary Account of East–West Differences (2011, methodology): “These have been referred to by different names, such as systems 1 and 2 (Kahneman 2003; Stanovich 1999), associative and rule-based systems (Sloman 1996), and experiential and rational systems (Epstein 1994).”
- Self-talk: Review and sport-specific model (2016, methodology): “Because mental effort is a limited resource, however, exclusive or extensive use of System 2 self-talk can deplete System 2 capacity, leading to processing disruptions and performance decrements (Kahneman, 2003; Schmeichel & Baumeister, 2010; Wegner, 1989).”
- Bringing appraisal theory to environmental risk perception: a review of conceptual approaches of the past 40 years and suggestions for future research (2012, background): “Affect has been theorized to play an important role in motivating behavior (Damasio 1994; Isen 1997; Kahneman 2003; Zajonc 1980).”
- Limited Investor Attention and Stock Market Misreactions to Accounting Information (2011, neutral): “Attention requires effort and, since the amount of information available is vast, must be selective (e.g.,Kahneman 1973).”