René Bekkers

Sociology and Political Science · 2003–2016

A researcher in the Science corpus: 13 papers; trusts 79 researchers and is trusted by 25 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Sociology and Political Science — 158 citations into it; #1,685 of 22,756 by trust here, #3,852 by citations
• Safety Research — 83 citations into it; #560 of 5,829 by trust here, #1,460 by citations
• Economics and Econometrics — 54 citations into it
• Social Psychology — 36 citations into it
• Gender Studies — 28 citations into it
• Clinical Psychology — 19 citations into it
• Demography — 19 citations into it
• Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management — 18 citations into it; #5,406 of 8,741 by trust here, #7,011 by citations

Whom René Bekkers trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. Louis A. Penner
2. Robert D. Putnam
3. L. R. Goldberg
4. Catherine C. Eckel
5. Philippe Huber
6. David C. Ribar
7. M. Ashton
8. Stephan Meier
9. B. Roberts
10. James Andreoni

Who trusts René Bekkers overall

1. Pamala Wiepking
2. D. Mesch
3. Sara Konrath
4. F. Handy
5. P. V. van Lange
6. A. Wit
7. M. Brown
8. Martin Binder
9. Christoph Engel
10. Mary Kay Gugerty

Papers from René Bekkers's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers René Bekkers trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. Altruistic punishment in humans (Nature)
2. Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community (Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work)
3. The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism
4. The Effects of Seed Money and Refunds on Charitable Giving: Experimental Evidence from a University Capital Campaign (Journal of Political Economy)
5. Altruistic and Joy‐of‐Giving Motivations in Charitable Behavior (Journal of Political Economy)
6. Public goods experiments without confidentiality: a glimpse into fund-raising
7. Social distance and other-regarding behavior in dictator games
8. Do Government Grants to Private Charities Crowd Out Giving or Fund-raising?
9. Gender Differences in Preferences
10. Helping a Victim or Helping the Victim: Altruism and Identifiability

Their papers

• A Literature Review of Empirical Studies of Philanthropy (2010) — 1,500 citations
• Helping Behavior, Dispositional Empathic Concern, and the Principle of Care (2006) — 225 citations
• Are Conservatives Less Likely to be Prosocial than Liberals? From Games to Ideology, Political Preferences and Votingg (2012) — 131 citations
• From Games to Giving: Social Value Orientation Predicts Donations to Noble Causes (2007) — 251 citations
• Who gives what and when? A scenario study of intentions to give time and money (2010) — 178 citations
• Trust, Accreditation, and Philanthropy in the Netherlands (2003) — 317 citations
• Measuring Altruistic Behavior in Surveys: The All‐Or‐Nothing Dictator Game (2007) — 159 citations
• Traditional and Health-Related Philanthropy: The Role of Resources and Personality (2006) — 258 citations
• Trust and Volunteering: Selection or Causation? Evidence From a 4 Year Panel Study (2012) — 147 citations
• Government Support and Charitable Donations: A Meta-Analysis of the Crowding-out Hypothesis (2016) — 119 citations
• Generalized Trust Through Civic Engagement? Evidence from Five National Panel Studies (2015) — 131 citations
• Who gives? A literature review of predictors of charitable giving. Part two: gender, marital status, income, and wealth (2012) — 173 citations
• Participation in voluntary associations: relations with resources, personality, and political values (2005) — 252 citations