Public goods experiments without confidentiality: a glimpse into fund-raising
By James Andreoni, Ragan Petrie. 2004
748 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Demography, General Decision Sciences, Safety Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f11c8f5c7a84a0148a743101b7f395c8a7e17191
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Demography
- John A. List
- Fredrik Carlsson
- Zachary Grossman
- Ananish Chaudhuri
- S. Gaechter
- Christine L. Exley
- Stephan Meier
- René Bekkers
In General Decision Sciences
- Christine L. Exley
- Fredrik Carlsson
- John A. List
- Jayson L. Lusk
- Imran Rasul
- Zachary Grossman
- Stephan Meier
- James Andreoni
In Safety Research
- John A. List
- Pamala Wiepking
- Christine L. Exley
- René Bekkers
- Fredrik Carlsson
- Imran Rasul
- Zachary Grossman
- Ananish Chaudhuri
Citations in the corpus
- Nobody's watching? Subtle cues affect generosity in an anonymous economic game. (2005, background): “Previous economic experiments have manipulated economic incentives and have adjusted game rules and parameters to provide real anonymity or eliminate real opportunities for reputation formation within experimental contexts ( Andreoni & Petrie, 2004; Hoffman, McCabe, Shachat, & Smith, 1994; Hoffman,”
- Sustaining cooperation in laboratory public goods experiments: a selective survey of the literature (2011, background): “35The possible applications are numerous including charitable contributions (Andreoni 2006; Andreoni and Petrie 2004; List and Lucking-Reiley 2002; Martin and Randal 2008; Vesterlund 2003), tax compliance (Andreoni et al. 1998; Frey and Torgler 2007), managing natural resources (Cardenas et al.…”
- Groups Reward Individual Sacrifice: The Status Solution to the Collective Action Problem (2009, background): “The solution I propose considers status in the group as an implicit, selective incentive.”
- A Literature Review of Empirical Studies of Philanthropy (2010, background): “When given the choice, people generally prefer their donations to be known by others (Andreoni & Petrie, 2004).”
- Anonymity in Giving in a Natural Context : A Field Experiment in 30 Churches (2005, background): “For the complete model, the initial increase in proceeds of the second offering by the introduction is estimated at 10.1%.24 This increase is smaller as in Andreoni and Petrie (2004), who find an initial increase of about 35%.”
- Hey Look at Me: The Effect of Giving Circles on Giving (2014, neutral): “[2] Andreoni, J.”
- Self-signaling and social-signaling in giving (2015, background): “Of these two possibilities, social-image concern has been more heavily studied and documented (e.g. Andreoni and Petrie, 2004; Soetevent, 2005; Alpizar et al., 2008), yet the fact that the social-signaling evidence presented here (and much of the previously cited work) is generated in laboratory…”
- The impact of buyer–seller relationships and reference prices on the effectiveness of the pay what you want pricing mechanism (2013, neutral): “Further research on donations described a pattern where people acted more pro-socially when they were in public compared to when they were in private (Andreoni and Petrie 2004; Soetevent 2005).”
- Public Preferences and Private Choices: Effect of Altruism and Free Riding on Demand for Environmentally Certified Pork (2007, background): “3. A number of other explanations for the laboratory behavior have been put forth such as respondent confusion (Andreoni 1995) or decision error (Anderson et al. 1998), considerations of fairness (Fehr and Schmidt 2000), and degree of confidentiality ( Andreoni and Petrie 2004 ), just to name a few.”
- Design of Stated Preference Surveys: Is There More to Learn from Behavioral Economics? (2010, background): “Context is of course a broad concept, but includes factors such as whether the action is observed by others (e.g., Alpizar et al. 2008a; Andreoni and Petrie 2004; Legget et al. 2003; List et al. 2004), information about what others do (Bardsley and Sausgruber 2005; Carlsson et al. 2008; Frey and M”
- How the Grapevine Keeps You in Line (2011, background): “…to groups has shown that identifiability, or the fact that others know about one’s contribution, can influence actual contributions (e.g., Andreoni & Petrie, 2004; Charness & Gneezy, 2008; Hoffman, McCabe, Shachat, & Smith, 1994; Hoffman, McCabe, & Smith, 1996; Nowak & Sigmund, 1998;…”