Traditional and Health-Related Philanthropy: The Role of Resources and Personality

By René Bekkers. 2006

258 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Health, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6b50fcc5c77ae560b1ab98b7e3a84a20ab742af3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Health

In Safety Research

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Empathy as added value in predicting donation behavior (2011, background): “Bekkers (2006) also finds that financial capital promotes traditional philanthropy (i.e., monetary donations), such that the availability of resources in the form of financial capital reduces the cost of charitable giving.”
Measuring Altruistic Behavior in Surveys: The All‐Or‐Nothing Dictator Game (2007, unknown): “The increase of donations with age is in line with previous research on charitable giving in the Netherlands (Bekkers 2006) as well as in the US (Havens, O’Herlihy and Schervish 2006; Rooney et al.”
Resources That Make You Generous: Effects of Social and Human Resources on Charitable Giving (2009, background): “This implies that there are limits to the level of control donors have over the ways charitable organizations spend their money (Bekkers 2006).”
A Literature Review of Empirical Studies of Philanthropy (2010, background): “…and marketing scientists, show that people who have altruistic values (Bekkers & Schuyt, 2008; Farmer & Fedor, 2001), who have prosocial values (Bekkers, 2006b, 2007; Van Lange et al., 2007), who are less materialistic in general (Sargeant et al., 2000), who endorse postmaterialistic goals in…”
Who gives what and when? A scenario study of intentions to give time and money (2010, unknown): “This finding is not in line with Bekkers’ (2006) finding of a positive relationship between social value orientation and charitable giving.”
Who gives? A literature review of predictors of charitable giving. Part two: gender, marital status, income, and wealth (2012, background): “…Okten and Osili, 2004; Wu et al, 2004; Bielefeld et al, 2005; Chang, 2005b; Lyons and Passey, 2005; Rooney et al, 2005; Van Slyke and Brooks, 2005; Bekkers, 2006; Bekkers and Wiepking, 2006; Carman, 2006; Houston, 2006; Lyons and Nivison-Smith, 2006; Matsunaga, 2006; Mesch et al, 2006; Havens et…”
Personality Psychology and Economics (2011, unknown): “Ben-Ner and Kramer (2011) find that Extraversion is associated with higher giving in a dictator game.”
The Development and Validation of the Motives to Donate Scale (2018, background): “In general, the other four traits (Openness, Extraversion, Conscientiousness, Agreeableness) showed the reverse pattern, with a tendency toward more public-benefit, and less private-benefit, motives for donating (Table 6).”