Edward J. Latessa

Sociology and Political Science · 2002–2017

A researcher in the Science corpus: 14 papers; trusts 15 researchers and is trusted by 18 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Sociology and Political Science — 59 citations into it; #3,542 of 22,756 by trust here, #2,558 by citations
• Clinical Psychology — 55 citations into it; #1,557 of 8,024 by trust here, #1,319 by citations
• General Health Professions — 16 citations into it; #1,700 of 4,781 by trust here, #1,433 by citations

Whom Edward J. Latessa trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. Christopher W. Baird
2. P. Gendreau
3. Christopher T. Lowenkamp
4. Mark Lipsey
5. Demetra Andrews
6. David B. Wilson
7. D. Mackenzie
8. Claire Goggin
9. J. Bonta
10. S. Wilson

Who trusts Edward J. Latessa overall

1. Christopher T. Lowenkamp
2. F. Cullen
3. D. Shaffer
4. Alexander M. Holsinger
5. P. Smith
6. Faye S. Taxman
7. J. Bonta
8. Demetra Andrews
9. D. Hubbard
10. Brian K. Lovins

Papers from Edward J. Latessa's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Edward J. Latessa trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. DOES CORRECTIONAL PROGRAM QUALITY REALLY MATTER? THE IMPACT OF ADHERING TO THE PRINCIPLES OF EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION*
2. Effective correctional treatment and violent reoffending: A meta-analysis
3. A META‐ANALYSIS OF THE PREDICTORS OF ADULT OFFENDER RECIDIVISM: WHAT WORKS!*
4. Twenty years of operational use of a risk prediction instrument: The United States parole commission's salient factor score
5. The Primary Factors that Characterize Effective Interventions with Juvenile Offenders: A Meta-Analytic Overview
6. Evidence-Based Corrections: Identifying What Works
7. The Accuracy of Five Risk Appraisal Instruments in Predicting Institutional Misconduct and New Convictions
8. Inference by eye: confidence intervals and how to read pictures of data. (American Psychologist)
9. Managing correctional treatment for reduced recidivism: A meta‐analytic review of programme integrity
10. INCREASING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CORRECTIONAL PROGRAMMING THROUGH THE RISK PRINCIPLE: IDENTIFYING OFFENDERS FOR RESIDENTIAL PLACEMENT*

Their papers

• Can 14,737 women be wrong? A meta‐analysis of the LSI‐R and recidivism for female offenders* (2009) — 263 citations
• DOES CORRECTIONAL PROGRAM QUALITY REALLY MATTER? THE IMPACT OF ADHERING TO THE PRINCIPLES OF EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION* (2006) — 370 citations
• The Risk Principle in Action: What Have We Learned From 13,676 Offenders and 97 Correctional Programs? (2006) — 536 citations
• INCREASING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CORRECTIONAL PROGRAMMING THROUGH THE RISK PRINCIPLE: IDENTIFYING OFFENDERS FOR RESIDENTIAL PLACEMENT* (2005) — 287 citations
• Ethnicity, gender, and the Level of Service Inventory-Revised (2003) — 93 citations
• The Effect of Drug Court Programming on Recidivism: the Cincinnati Experience (2003) — 125 citations
• Applying the Risk Principle to Sex Offenders (2009) — 114 citations
• Exploring the validity of the Level of Service Inventory-Revised with Native American offenders (2006) — 105 citations
• Predicting outcome with the Level of Service Inventory-Revised: The importance of implementation integrity (2006) — 94 citations
• Reducing Inmate Misconduct and Prison Returns with Facility Education Programs (2017) — 101 citations
• The Role of Offender Risk Assessment: A Policy Maker Guide (2010) — 123 citations
• Intensive supervision programs: Does program philosophy and the principles of effective intervention matter?☆ (2010) — 95 citations
• Adhering to the Risk and Need Principles: Does It Matter for Supervision-Based Programs? (2006) — 79 citations
• Beyond Correctional Quackery-Professionalism and the Possibility of Effective Treatment (2002) — 185 citations