Can 14,737 women be wrong? A meta‐analysis of the LSI‐R and recidivism for female offenders*

By P. Smith, F. Cullen, Edward J. Latessa. 2009

263 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/93ca30827dd5b85c10325fb7fca5bbe3e588b4ab

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Validating the Principles of Effective Intervention: A Systematic Review of the Contributions of Meta-Analysis in the Field of Corrections (2009, background): “Furthermore, meta-analyses of composite risk measures (such as the Level of Supervision/Case Management Inventory) have demonstrated that these instruments are highly useful in predicting recidivism and facilitating case management decisions ( Campbell, French, & Gendreau, 2007 ; Gendreau, Goggin, ”
Reentry and the Ties that Bind: An Examination of Social Ties, Employment, and Recidivism (2011, background): “The efficacy of the LSI-R has been well documented (Gendreau, Little, & Goggin, 1996; Petersilia, 2003); however, it is important to note that there is an ongoing debate surrounding the utility of this instrument for women (see Holtfreter, Reisig, & Morash, 2004; Smith et al., 2009).”
Rehabilitation: Beyond Nothing Works (2013, background): “Research reveals that the LSI-R has predictive validity (Vose, Cullen, and Smith 2008; Smith, Cullen, and Latessa 2009; Andrews and Bonta 2010).”
Women’s Risk Factors and Their Contributions to Existing Risk/Needs Assessment (2010, background): “Although the gender-responsive risk/needs assessments may certainly be supported on the basis of relevance and validity alone, the issue of incremental validity is highly relevant to emerging conflicts (Hannah-Moffat, 2009; Morash, 2009; Smith et al., 2009; Taylor & Blanchette, 2009) between the Can”
General Risk and Need, Gender Specificity, and the Recidivism of Female Offenders (2010, background): “On one hand, some scholars have concluded that many of the correlates and predictors of adult female crime are similar across gender (Andrews, Bonta, Wormith, Guzzo, & Brews, 2008; Loucks & Zamble, 1999; Smith et al., 2009).”
The predictive validity of risk assessment tools for female offenders: A systematic review (2015, unknown): “Smith, Cullen, and Latessa (2009) conducted a meta-analysis evaluating the merits of the LSI-R in predicting recidivism in female offenders.”
Examining the Validity of a Juvenile Offending Risk Assessment Instrument Across Gender and Race/Ethnicity (2013, background): “Some research has demonstrated assessment tools to be equally predictive of female offending (Gendreau, Goggin, & Smith, 2002; Olver et al., 2009; Schwalbe, 2008; Smith et al., 2009).”
Sources of Variability in Estimates of Predictive Validity (2011, background): “Sample 3 from Smith, Cullen, and Latessa (2009) Table 1.”