Christopher W. Baird
Clinical Psychology · 2000–2013
A researcher in the Science corpus: 3 papers; trusts 3 researchers and is trusted by 0 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.
Subfields
- Clinical Psychology — 14 citations into it
- Sociology and Political Science — 14 citations into it
Whom Christopher W. Baird trusts overall
Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.
- Michael T. Baglivio
- Douglas G. Altman
- J. Landis
- Min Yang
- Demetra Andrews
- Patrick Royston
- Katherine Jackowski
- R. Hoge
- Gary G. Koch
- J. Bonta
Who trusts Christopher W. Baird overall
- Edward J. Latessa
- Michael T. Baglivio
- Susan F. Turner
- J. Skeem
- Brian K. Lovins
- R. Serin
- Michael Caudy
- G. Vincent
- C. Regehr
- Kevin T. Wolff
Papers from Christopher W. Baird's perspective
Ordered by how strongly the researchers Christopher W. Baird trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.
- The level of service inventory – revised
- Comparing Effect Sizes in Follow-Up Studies: ROC Area, Cohen's d, and r (Law and Human Behavior)
- The assessment of risk to recidivate among a juvenile offending population
- Examining the Validity of a Juvenile Offending Risk Assessment Instrument Across Gender and Race/Ethnicity
- A META‐ANALYSIS OF THE PREDICTORS OF ADULT OFFENDER RECIDIVISM: WHAT WORKS!*
- Statistical Risk Assessment: Old Problems and New Applications
- The efficacy of violence prediction: a meta-analytic comparison of nine risk assessment tools.
- Standardized Instruments for Assessing Risk and Need in Youthful Offenders
- Science Current Directions in Psychological Current Directions in Violence Risk Assessment on Behalf Of: Association for Psychological Science
- A Question of Evidence: A Critique of Risk Assessment Models Used in the Justice System
Their papers
- A Comparison of Risk Assessment Instruments in Juvenile Justice (2013) — 115 citations
- A Question of Evidence: A Critique of Risk Assessment Models Used in the Justice System (2009) — 99 citations
- The relative validity of actuarial- and consensus-based risk assessment systems (2000) — 212 citations