The Effect of Drug Court Programming on Recidivism: the Cincinnati Experience

By S. J. Listwan, Jody L. Sundt, Alexander M. Holsinger, Edward J. Latessa. 2003

125 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Epidemiology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/04569fb5938402a81d76bbb7eec89337c536b53e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. C. Kubrin
2. Eric A. Stewart
3. D. Shaffer
4. Kevin T. Wolff
5. Michael T. Baglivio
6. Nathan Epps

In Epidemiology

1. C. Kubrin
2. Eric A. Stewart
3. D. Shaffer
4. Travis C. Pratt

In Sociology and Political Science

1. C. Kubrin
2. Eric A. Stewart
3. D. Shaffer
4. Travis C. Pratt
5. J. Turanovic
6. D. Cornell
7. Kevin T. Wolff
8. Michael T. Baglivio

Citations in the corpus

• Looking Inside the Black Box of Drug Courts: A Meta‐Analytic Review (2011, background): “The early success of the Miami Drug Court, coupled with financial and political support, led to its rapid expansion to jurisdictions throughout the country (Listwan et al., 2003).”
• PREDICTING WHO REOFFENDS: THE NEGLECTED ROLE OF NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT IN RECIDIVISM STUDIES* (2006, methodology): “Men, minorities, and younger offenders also recidivate more (Benedict, Huff-Corzine, and Corzine, 1998; Clarke et al., 1988; Gainey, Payne, and O’Toole, 2000; Gendreau, Little, and Goggin, 1996; Hepburn and Albonetti, 1994; Listwan et al., 2003; Schwaner, 1998; Spohn and Holleran, 2002; Ulmer, 2001)”