Alexander M. Holsinger

Sociology and Political Science · 2003–2015

A researcher in the Science corpus: 10 papers; trusts 5 researchers and is trusted by 7 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Sociology and Political Science — 22 citations into it; #8,134 of 22,756 by trust here, #4,709 by citations
• Clinical Psychology — 20 citations into it; #2,493 of 8,024 by trust here, #1,895 by citations
• General Health Professions — 8 citations into it

Whom Alexander M. Holsinger trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. Demetra Andrews
2. Christopher T. Lowenkamp
3. Mark Lipsey
4. J. Bonta
5. Edward J. Latessa
6. P. Gendreau
7. W. Grove

Who trusts Alexander M. Holsinger overall

1. Christopher T. Lowenkamp
2. J. Skeem
3. Edward J. Latessa
4. Duyen Luong
5. C. Kubrin

Papers from Alexander M. Holsinger's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Alexander M. Holsinger trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. Effective correctional treatment and violent reoffending: A meta-analysis
2. DOES CORRECTIONAL PROGRAM QUALITY REALLY MATTER? THE IMPACT OF ADHERING TO THE PRINCIPLES OF EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION*
3. Twenty years of operational use of a risk prediction instrument: The United States parole commission's salient factor score
4. The Primary Factors that Characterize Effective Interventions with Juvenile Offenders: A Meta-Analytic Overview
5. Managing correctional treatment for reduced recidivism: A meta‐analytic review of programme integrity
6. INCREASING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CORRECTIONAL PROGRAMMING THROUGH THE RISK PRINCIPLE: IDENTIFYING OFFENDERS FOR RESIDENTIAL PLACEMENT*
7. Evidence-Based Corrections: Identifying What Works
8. A META‐ANALYSIS OF THE PREDICTORS OF ADULT OFFENDER RECIDIVISM: WHAT WORKS!*
9. Clinical versus mechanical prediction: a meta-analysis.
10. Practical Meta-Analysis

Their papers

• The Risk Principle in Action: What Have We Learned From 13,676 Offenders and 97 Correctional Programs? (2006) — 536 citations
• A random study of Staff Training Aimed at Reducing Re-arrest (STARR): using core correctional practices in probation interactions (2012) — 98 citations
• The federal Post Conviction Risk Assessment (PCRA): a construction and validation study. (2013) — 60 citations
• Ethnicity, gender, and the Level of Service Inventory-Revised (2003) — 93 citations
• The Effect of Drug Court Programming on Recidivism: the Cincinnati Experience (2003) — 125 citations
• Pretrial Risk Assessment: Improving Public Safety and Fairness in Pretrial Decision Making (2015) — 21 citations
• Exploring the validity of the Level of Service Inventory-Revised with Native American offenders (2006) — 105 citations
• Predicting outcome with the Level of Service Inventory-Revised: The importance of implementation integrity (2006) — 94 citations
• Intensive supervision programs: Does program philosophy and the principles of effective intervention matter?☆ (2010) — 95 citations
• Differential Pathways to Violence and Self-Injurious Behavior: African American and White Girls in the Juvenile Justice System (2005) — 104 citations