Managing correctional treatment for reduced recidivism: A meta‐analytic review of programme integrity

By Demetra Andrews, C. Dowden. 2005

199 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/86ce0493545105674e7aa2bceba3bd1e720e82c8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. J. Bonta
2. Christopher T. Lowenkamp
3. Edward J. Latessa
4. J. Wormith
5. Demetra Andrews
6. Alexander M. Holsinger
7. Mary McMurran
8. R. Gobeil

In Sociology and Political Science

1. J. Bonta
2. J. Wormith
3. Demetra Andrews
4. Christopher T. Lowenkamp
5. Alexander M. Holsinger
6. Edward J. Latessa
7. Mary McMurran
8. R. Gobeil

Citations in the corpus

• A Meta-Analytic Review of Correctional Interventions for Women Offenders (2016, background): “For example, it was not possible to code interventions’ dosages or the fidelity with which they were implemented, though both of these have been identified as key in the success of correctional interventions (Andrews & Dowden, 2005; Bourgon & Armstrong, 2006; Gendreau, Goggin, & Smith, 1999).”
• Reconstructing the Risk-Need-Responsivity model: A theoretical elaboration and evaluation (2007, unknown): “Furthermore, adherence to the RNR principles provides a context within which increased program integrity, organizational adherence to integrity standards, and better staff practice can improve treatment outcomes (Andrews & Dowden, 2005; Dowden & Andrews, 2004).”
• The Rehabilitation and Reintegration of Offenders (2007, background): “The extent to which these principles are followed and treatment integrity is practiced correlates highly with client outcome as measured by recidivism (Andrews & Dowden, 2005; Latessa, 2004).”
• Motivational interviewing with offenders: A systematic review (2009, background): “The British Psychological Society Legal and Criminological Psychology (2009), 14, 83–100 q 2009 The British Psychological Society www.bpsjournals.co.uk DOI:10.1348/135532508X278326 principles are more effective than those that do not (Andrews & Dowden, 2005).”
• Sources of Variability in Estimates of Predictive Validity (2011, background): “Indeed, Andrews and Dowden (2005) revealed that the simple correlation between “allegiance” and the crime reduction effect of programming was substantial (a correlation of .42 with reduced reoffending in 374 tests of interventions).”
• Intensive supervision programs: Does program philosophy and the principles of effective intervention matter?☆ (2010, background): “Additionally, recent empirical works have found a number of previously unidentified programmatic issues to be potentially relevant for the provision of effective services, particularly that of program philosophy (Fulton et al., 1997) and program integrity (Andrews & Dowden, 2005).”