Effective correctional treatment and violent reoffending: A meta-analysis

By C. Dowden, Demetra Andrews. 2000

393 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/12ee0a41aa2d77c4ccc9f955df5ca74e4fd70157

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

Citations in the corpus

A Meta-Analytic Review of Correctional Interventions for Women Offenders (2016, result): “In the years that followed, a very large number of studies supported the findings of Andrews and colleagues (e.g., Dowden & Andrews, 1999, 2000; Hanson, Bourgon, Helmus, & Hodgson, 2009; Lowenkamp, Latessa, & Smith, 2006), and the evidence that correctional interventions reduce recidivism is now…”
Reconstructing the Risk-Need-Responsivity model: A theoretical elaboration and evaluation (2007, neutral): “Subsequent meta‐analyses by Andrews and Dowden have provided similar evidence from a variety of specific offender groups, including juvenile delinquents (Dowden & Andrews, 1999a; Dowden & Andrews, 2003), violent offenders (Dowden & Andrews, 2000), and female offenders (Dowden & Andrews, 1999b).”
The Effectiveness of Restorative Justice Practices: A Meta-Analysis (2005, neutral): “…studies have investigated the prediction (Bonta, Law, & Hanson, 1998; Dowden & Brown, 2002; Gendreau, Little, & Goggin, 1996; Hanson & Bussière, 1998) and treatment (Andrews et al., 1990; Dowden & Andrews, 1999, 2000; Latimer, 2001; Lipsey, 1995; Whitehead & Lab, 1989) of criminal behavior.”
Predicting work-related stress in correctional officers: A meta-analysis. (2004, positive): “…techniques were used to consolidate the prediction (Bonta, Law, & Hanson, 1998; Dowden & Brown, 2001; Gendreau, Little, & Goggin, 1996; Hanson & Bussiere, 1998) and treatment literatures (Andrews et al., 1990; Dowden & Andrews, 1999, 2000; Izzo & Ross, 1990; Losel, 1995; Whitehead & Lab, 1989).”
Rehabilitating criminal justice policy and practice. (2010, background): “Adherence to the principles in treatment programs also appear relevant to violent offending (Dowden & Andrews, 2000), prison misconducts (French & Gendreau, 2006), gangs (Di Placido, Simon, Witte, Gu, & Wong, 2006), and even sexual offending (Hanson, Bourgon, Helmus, & Hodgson, 2009).”
INCREASING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CORRECTIONAL PROGRAMMING THROUGH THE RISK PRINCIPLE: IDENTIFYING OFFENDERS FOR RESIDENTIAL PLACEMENT* (2005, background): “…our findings but should also investigate the relationship between other program characteristics and effectiveness (Andrews and Dowden, 1999; Gendreau and Goggin, 2000; Gendreau et al., 2002; Lipsey 1999a, 1999b), as understanding why some programs were effective with high-risk offenders…”
The Risk Principle in Action: What Have We Learned From 13,676 Offenders and 97 Correctional Programs? (2006, background): “…target offenders who are higher risk are more effective in reducing recidivism than those that do not (Andrews et al., 1990; Andrews & Dowden, 1999; Dowden & Andrews, 1999a, 1999b, 2000; Lowenkamp & Latessa, 2005b); however, the questions still remain: Are there aspects of the risk principle that…”
VIOLENCE RISK ASSESSMENT: Getting Specific About Being Dynamic (2005, background): “On the basis of a comprehensive review, Dowden and Andrews (2000) found that 1We note that, while dynamic risk might be most relevant in community settings, clearly it applies in institutional settings as well, as clinicians must identify and reduce risk factors while persons are institutionalized.”
The Risk Need Responsivity Model of Offender Rehabilitation: Is There Really a Need for a Paradigm Shift?. (2013, methodology): “Dowden and Andrews (2000) conducted a meta-analysis of 35 studies of violent offenders and again found that programs adhering to RNR principles were more effective than those which did not.”
The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: a meta-analysis of recidivism studies. (2005, background): “For general offenders, treatment is effective only when it targets criminogenic needs (i.e., characteristics associated with offending; Dowden & Andrews, 2000).”
Looking Inside the Black Box of Drug Courts: A Meta‐Analytic Review (2011, background): “…modest in this study, there is ample research documenting the relationship between adhering to these principles and improved outcomes (e.g., Andrews & Dowden, 2006; Bourgon & Armstrong, 2005; Dowden & Andrews, 1999, 2000; French & Gendreau, 2006; Lowenkamp et al., 2006; Pearson et al., 2002).”
A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of CBT informed anger management (2015, background): “Dowden and Andrews (2000) explored anger management and offending behavior and found significant positive treatment effect for programs focusing on anger management and relapse prevention had sizes in the offenders.”
The Primary Factors that Characterize Effective Interventions with Juvenile Offenders: A Meta-Analytic Overview (2009, background): “…et al. have demonstrated that studies of interventions they judge as conforming to their need, responsivity, and risk principles show larger effects on recidivism than those that do not (Andrews & Bonta, 2006; Andrews et al., 1990; Dowden & Andrews, 1999, 2000; Gendreau, Smith, & French, 2006).”