DOES CORRECTIONAL PROGRAM QUALITY REALLY MATTER? THE IMPACT OF ADHERING TO THE PRINCIPLES OF EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION*

By Christopher T. Lowenkamp, Edward J. Latessa, P. Smith. 2006

370 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Epidemiology, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/79cdf81d4ba93634d33260f6c852941778feaa41

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Epidemiology

1. D. Shaffer

In General Health Professions

1. Alexander M. Holsinger
2. Edward J. Latessa
3. P. Smith
4. Christopher T. Lowenkamp
5. K. Swartz
6. P. Gendreau
7. J. Bonta
8. Demetra Andrews

In Sociology and Political Science

1. J. Bonta
2. Christopher T. Lowenkamp
3. Edward J. Latessa
4. P. Gendreau
5. D. Shaffer
6. Alexander M. Holsinger
7. Demetra Andrews
8. P. Smith

Citations in the corpus

• Can we avoid reductionism in risk reduction? (2017, background): “Without a doubt, the approach spearheaded by Andrews and Bonta has inspired new optimism within the field of criminal justice scholarship and practice that certain highrisk individuals can benefit from interventions focused on these “Big Four” risk factors (Cullen, 2011; Cullen and Gendreau, 2001; G”
• Validating the Principles of Effective Intervention: A Systematic Review of the Contributions of Meta-Analysis in the Field of Corrections (2009, background): “The lack of therapeutic integrity continues to be an ongoing problem of major proportions in corrections (Lipsey, 1999; Lowenkamp, Latessa, & Smith, 2006 ).”
• Looking Inside the Black Box of Drug Courts: A Meta‐Analytic Review (2011, background): “…modest in this study, there is ample research documenting the relationship between adhering to these principles and improved outcomes (e.g., Andrews & Dowden, 2006; Bourgon & Armstrong, 2005; Dowden & Andrews, 1999, 2000; French & Gendreau, 2006; Lowenkamp et al., 2006; Pearson et al., 2002).”
• Exploring the Black Box of Community Supervision (2008, background): “Problems with the integrity of service delivery within corrections have been noted by others (eg, Harris et al, 2004 ) and it has been especially problematic when trying to apply the principles of Risk, Need and Responsivity (Andrews, 2006 ; Lowenkamp, Latessa & Holsinger, 2006 ; Lowenkamp, Lates”
• Rehabilitating criminal justice policy and practice. (2010, background): “Lowenkamp, Latessa, and Smith (2006) underscored the importance of program integrity in the deliver of RNR-based interventions.”
• Intensive supervision programs: Does program philosophy and the principles of effective intervention matter?☆ (2010, background): “Given the findings from the current research is consistent with other findings (e.g. Lowenkamp et al., 2006), the empirical evidence suggests that treatment programs should strive to implement assessment processes such as the CPAI in order insure that they are maintaining necessary levels of…”