Karl Bang Christensen

General Health Professions · 2002–2017

A researcher in the Science corpus: 10 papers; trusts 12 researchers and is trusted by 25 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Karl Bang Christensen trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. S. Reise
  2. Peter McCullagh
  3. Bradley Efron
  4. T. Kristensen
  5. Yoav Benjamini
  6. W. Stout
  7. Philip G. Conaghan
  8. Robert Tibshirani
  9. S. Kreiner
  10. Y. Hochberg

Who trusts Karl Bang Christensen overall

  1. K. Nielsen
  2. Sandra Heldsinger
  3. D. Andrich
  4. R. Randall
  5. Stephen M. Humphry
  6. S. Kreiner
  7. R. Rugulies
  8. S. Youn
  9. A. Shirom
  10. T. Cox

Papers from Karl Bang Christensen's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Karl Bang Christensen trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing
  2. SF-36 health survey: Manual and interpretation guide
  3. The Copenhagen Burnout Inventory: A new tool for the assessment of burnout
  4. Work-related stress and depressive disorders. (Journal of Psychosomatic Research)
  5. The Danish psychosocial work environment and symptoms of stress: The main, mediating and moderating role of sense of coherence
  6. The Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire--a tool for the assessment and improvement of the psychosocial work environment. (Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health)
  7. Allostatic load as a marker of cumulative biological risk: MacArthur studies of successful aging (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America)
  8. The distinction between work pace and working hours in the measurement of quantitative demands at work
  9. Impact of the psychosocial work environment on registered absence from work: A two-year longitudinal study using the IPAW cohort
  10. Psychosocial and material pathways in the relation between income and health: a response to Lynch et al (British medical journal)

Their papers