Applying the Rasch Model

766 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Using the method of pairwise comparison to obtain reliable teacher assessments (2010, methodology): “It has also been used in sports (Bond & Fox, 2001, p. 152).”
Validity argument for assessing L2 pragmatics in interaction using mixed methods (2015, background): “…in the fourth column show that all categories are within the acceptable fit range of 0.78 and 1.22, based on M ± (2 × SD) (i.e., 1 ± (2 × 0.11)), indicating that the rating criteria functioned as intended and contributed to measuring one construct (i.e., pragmatic competence) (Bond & Fox, 2007).”