Chih-Hsun Chuang

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management · 2003–2010

A researcher in the Science corpus: 2 papers; trusts 21 researchers and is trusted by 12 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Chih-Hsun Chuang trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. David P. Lepak
  2. Riki Takeuchi
  3. David P. MacKinnon
  4. Anthea Zacharatos
  5. Marisa Salanova
  6. Aaron B. Taylor
  7. Patrick M. Wright
  8. Scott A. Snell
  9. Garry A. Gelade
  10. E. Whitener

Who trusts Chih-Hsun Chuang overall

  1. Kaifeng Jiang
  2. D. Bowen
  3. Yun-Hwa Chiang
  4. Benjamin Schneider
  5. Jie Shen
  6. A. Gamage
  7. Jia Hu
  8. Chu-Chun Hsu
  9. David P. Lepak
  10. K. van de Voorde

Papers from Chih-Hsun Chuang's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Chih-Hsun Chuang trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. (Psychological methods)
  2. Do “high commitment” human resource practices affect employee commitment? A cross-level analysis using hierarchical linear modeling
  3. Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations. (Psychological methods)
  4. Examining the Human Resource Architecture: The Relationships Among Human Capital, Employment, and Human Resource Configurations
  5. High-performance work systems and occupational safety. (Journal of Applied Psychology)
  6. An empirical examination of the mechanisms mediating between high-performance work systems and the performance of Japanese organizations. (Journal of Applied Psychology)
  7. Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis.
  8. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HR PRACTICES AND FIRM PERFORMANCE: EXAMINING CAUSAL ORDER
  9. On the validity of subjective measures of company performance
  10. Perceived organizational support: a review of the literature. (Journal of Applied Psychology)

Their papers