sarah mcgrew

Sociology and Political Science · 2017–2019

A researcher in the Science corpus: 4 papers; trusts 7 researchers and is trusted by 9 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom sarah mcgrew trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Marc Prensky
  2. Miriam J. Metzger
  3. Eszter Hargittai
  4. Amber Walraven
  5. Gerd Gigerenzer
  6. L. Jussim
  7. Saskia Brand-Gruwel
  8. Heidi E. Julien
  9. Ziva Kunda
  10. Renee Hobbs

Who trusts sarah mcgrew overall

  1. Thomas Nygren
  2. Joel Breakstone
  3. Mona Guath
  4. Sam Wineburg
  5. Mark D. Smith
  6. Gale M. Sinatra

Papers from sarah mcgrew's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers sarah mcgrew trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Making sense of credibility on the Web: Models for evaluating online information and recommendations for future research
  2. Believe it or not: Factors influencing credibility on the Web (J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol.)
  3. The case for motivated reasoning.
  4. Digital and Media Literacy: A Plan of Action
  5. In Google We Trust: Users' Decisions on Rank, Position, and Relevance (J. Comput. Mediat. Commun.)
  6. How students evaluate information and sources when searching the World Wide Web for information (Comput. Educ.)
  7. Social and Heuristic Approaches to Credibility Evaluation Online
  8. Developing a unifying framework of credibility assessment: Construct, heuristics, and interaction in context (Information Processing & Management)
  9. Source Evaluation, Comprehension, and Learning in Internet Science Inquiry Tasks
  10. How do users evaluate the credibility of Web sites?: a study with over 2,500 participants (Conference on Designing for User eXperiences)

Their papers