M. Sanders

Clinical Psychology · Clinical Psychology Review · 2000–2018

A researcher in the Science corpus: 22 papers; trusts 51 researchers and is trusted by 40 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom M. Sanders trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. R. Prinz
  2. Julian P. T. Higgins
  3. Gregory A. Aarons
  4. Christopher J. Nowak
  5. D. Fixsen
  6. Douglas G. Altman
  7. Mike W.-L. Cheung
  8. A. Kazdin
  9. Robert Goodman
  10. Scott B. Morris

Who trusts M. Sanders overall

  1. Richard Fletcher
  2. Emily Freeman
  3. R. Prinz
  4. A. Morawska
  5. Rae Thomas
  6. S. Matthey
  7. Christopher J. Nowak
  8. Youth Board on Children
  9. T. Mazzucchelli
  10. K. Turner

Papers from M. Sanders's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers M. Sanders trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Issues in Disseminating and Replicating Effective Prevention Programs (Prevention Science)
  2. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.)
  3. Triple P-Positive Parenting Program as a public health approach to strengthening parenting. (Journal of family psychology)
  4. The triple P-positive parenting program: a comparison of enhanced, standard, and self-directed behavioral family intervention for parents of children with early onset conduct problems. (Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology)
  5. Parent-child interaction therapy with physically abusive parents: efficacy for reducing future abuse reports. (Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology)
  6. Implementation Research: A Synthesis of the
  7. Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (Biometrics)
  8. A Review of Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (3rd ed.)
  9. Effectiveness of psychological interventions for child maltreatment: a meta-analysis
  10. Coverage Bias in Traditional Telephone Surveys of Low-Income and Young Adults

Their papers