Issues in Disseminating and Replicating Effective Prevention Programs

By D. Elliott, Sharon F. Mihalic. Prevention Science, 2004

810 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8ddc116f62d22d8c8ad4cf7a7fdae34d7801799c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

Citations in the corpus

Cultural Adaptations of Behavioral Health Interventions: A Progress Report (2012, neutral): “However, it is not always apparent which elements of an intervention are “core” and which are discretionary (Elliott & Mihalic, 2004).”
Maryland Statewide PBIS Initiative (2008, methodology): “Prior research on other school-based prevention models documents the importance of on-site technical assistance for ensuring high program fidelity and positive impacts on student outcomes (Elliott & Mihalic, 2004).”
What Works in Youth Violence Prevention (2013, background): “…are important but perhaps daunting to overcome, it is encouraging that policy makers, scientists, and local administrators and practitioners are increasingly discussing ways to foster the dissemination of effective practices (Beardslee et al., 2011; Elliott & Mihalic, 2004; Saul et al., 2008).”
Implementation Fidelity in Community-Based Interventions (2010, background): “Diminished fidelity during dissemination of interventions may be why interventions that work well in highly controlled trials may fail to yield the same outcomes when applied in real life contexts (Bellg et al., 2004; Elliott & Mihalic, 2004).”
The impact of trial stage, developer involvement and international transferability on universal social and emotional learning programme outcomes: a meta-analysis (2016, background): “These findings may be interpreted as indicating that the higher levels of fidelity produce higher outcomes, and has underpinned the argument that 100% fidelity is to be strived for and adaptations to be avoided in order to achieve outcomes (Elliott & Mihalic, 2004).”
Standards of Evidence: Criteria for Efficacy, Effectiveness and Dissemination (2005, background): “Prevention Science ( C© 2005) DOI: 10.1007/s11121-005-5553-y”
A Statewide Scale Up of Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports: A Description of the Development of Systems of Support and Analysis of Adoption and Implementation (2011, methodology): “Consistent with the literature (Elliott & Mihalic, 2004), it is a requirement in Maryland that each school have a building-specific coach, who, together with the district leadership, provides technical assistance, aids in problem solving, and maintains momentum and enthusiasm for the program within…”
The importance of studying the implementation of interventions in school settings (2012, background): “Programme ineffectiveness may be attributed to a failure to implement interventions with fidelity, that is as prescribed by the programme developers (Elliott & Mihalic, 2004; Raudenbush, 2008); this can be due either to barriers to implementation or to intentional local adaptations.”
The Principle of Cultural Grounding in School-Based Substance Abuse Prevention (2006, background): “Some argue that universal programs can be implemented without adaptation and maintain their effectiveness (Elliot & Mihalic, 2004).”
Sustainability of Teacher Implementation of School-Based Mental Health Programs (2005, background): “It therefore is essential that researchers examine mechanisms that can be integrated into the training process in order to increase the fidelity with which evidence-based mental health programs are, and continue to be, implemented by teachers (Adelman & Taylor, 2003; Altman, 1995; Elliott & Mihalic”
Training Therapists in Evidence-Based Practice: A Critical Review of Studies From a Systems-Contextual Perspective (2010, background): “Additionally, this has deleterious consequences for client treatment outcome given the finding that better outcomes are observed in clients when a treatment is applied with fidelity (Elliot & Mihalic, 2004).”
Social and Emotional Learning: Promoting the Development of All Students (2007, background): “Fidelity to program procedures has been found to lead to better outcomes; conversely, poor fidelity results in decreased effectiveness (Elliott & Mihalic, 2004).”