Conflict, metacognition, and analytic thinking
By Valerie A. Thompson, Stephen M. Johnson. 2014
180 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, General Decision Sciences
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9d5976799593de395425e8fec56ca6d1ab7c3531
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Jonathan Evans
- K. Stanovich
- Wim De Neys
- Gordon Pennycook
- Jonathan St. B. T. Evans
- Kenneth Gilhooly
- David G. Rand
- Oshin Vartanian
In General Decision Sciences
- Jonathan Evans
- K. Stanovich
- Keith Frankish
- Gerben A. van Kleef
- Gary Klein
- Brian W. Miller
- M. Toplak
- Ron Sun
Citations in the corpus
- Why does the Cognitive Reflection Test (sometimes) predict utilitarian moral judgment (and other things) (2015, unknown): “…evidence for such an account in terms of differences that exist from the beginning of thinking about a problem comes from a study of Thompson and Johnson (2014), who found that a measure of AOT correlated with answers given when subjects were instructed to provide a quick first response, but…”
- Reflections on reflection: the nature and function of type 2 processes in dual-process theories of reasoning (2019, background): “Less effort will be made if the intuition comes with a high FOR (Ackerman & Thompson, 2017; Thompson & Johnson, 2014; Thompson et al., 2011).”