The affect heuristic in judgments of risk and benefits’, Journal of Behavioural Decision Making, .
By Melissa L. Finucane, A. Alhakami, Paul Slovic, Stephen M. Johnson. 2000
102 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dcc0e9a23f51be0a8c8719fb126fb86a74a191b9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- James N. Druckman
- Daniel Västfjäll
- Sarah K. Howard
- Rose McDermott
- Paul Slovic
- Dan Kahan
- Michael Siegrist
- S. van der Linden
Citations in the corpus
- Risk-aversion: understanding teachers’ resistance to technology integration (2013, background): “The research of Finucane et al. (2000, 2003) considering the affect heuristic has shown that individuals having a positive affective response to an activity are likely to perceive it as less risky and of greater benefit.”
- Affect, Moral Intuition, and Risk (2010, background): “Finucane et al. (2000) tested this hypothesis for various technologies, providing information designed to manipulate affect by increasing or decreasing perceived benefit for the technology or by increasing or decreasing its perceived risk.”
- Emotion and the Framing of Risky Choice (2008, background): “The first represents a rapid, intuitive, often unconscious experiential response or reaction to perceived danger or threat; this interpretation constitutes the ‘‘affect heuristic’’ (Finucane et al. 2000).”