M. Peters

General Health Professions · JBI Evidence Synthesis · 2015–2022

A researcher in the Science corpus: 9 papers; trusts 6 researchers and is trusted by 2 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• General Health Professions — 66 citations into it; #3,909 of 4,781 by trust here, #936 by citations
• Statistics and Probability — 63 citations into it
• Sociology and Political Science — 15 citations into it
• Health — 9 citations into it

Whom M. Peters trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. Z. Munn
2. D. Levac
3. H. Arksey
4. K. Davis
5. Heather Colquhoun
6. Andrea C. Tricco
7. L. O’Malley
8. K. O’Brien
9. Cindy Stern
10. David Moher

Who trusts M. Peters overall

1. F. M. Van der Kleij
2. Andrea C. Tricco
3. Anastasiya A. Lipnevich
4. Lara N. Wolfers
5. R. Shelby
6. Lorainne Tudor Car
7. C. Bradbury‐Jones
8. Z. Munn
9. Firuz Kamalov
10. Frank M. Schneider

Papers from M. Peters's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers M. Peters trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. (Health Information and Libraries Journal)
2. Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews (International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare)
3. What are scoping studies? A review of the nursing literature. (International Journal of Nursing Studies)
4. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (Implementation science : IS)
5. A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews (BMC Medical Research Methodology)
6. 診断精度研究のバイアスリスク評価ツールQUADAS－2：a Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 の活用
7. The development of software to support multiple systematic review types: the Joanna Briggs Institute System for the Unified Management, Assessment and Review of Information (JBI SUMARI) (International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare)
8. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (British medical journal)
9. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (BMC Medical Research Methodology)
10. Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines (PLoS Medicine)

Their papers

• PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018) — 31,635 citations
• Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018) — 9,506 citations
• The development of software to support multiple systematic review types: the Joanna Briggs Institute System for the Unified Management, Assessment and Review of Information (JBI SUMARI) (2019) — 870 citations
• Best practice guidance and reporting items for the development of scoping review protocols (2022) — 943 citations
• Undertaking a scoping review: A practical guide for nursing and midwifery students, clinicians, researchers, and academics (2021) — 604 citations
• Scoping reviews: reinforcing and advancing the methodology and application (2021) — 710 citations
• Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2020) — 6,077 citations
• The Joanna Briggs Institute reviewers' manual 2015: methodology for JBI scoping reviews (2015) — 1,386 citations
• Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews (2015) — 6,023 citations