Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines

By David Moher, K. F. Schulz, Iveta Simera, Douglas G. Altman. PLoS Medicine, 2010

1,230 citations recorded by the source corpus.

David Moher and colleagues from the EQUATOR network offer guidance and recommended steps for developing health research reporting guidelines.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Health Professions, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/84c6f6c321a6e8e56482da94e2b40d1a98b78bf2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In General Health Professions

In Statistics and Probability

Citations in the corpus

Guidelines for Accurate and Transparent Health Estimates Reporting: the GATHER statement (2016, neutral): “The working group’s approach was based on published guidance for developing reporting guidelines [9].”
The STROCSS statement: Strengthening the Reporting of Cohort Studies in Surgery (2017, neutral): “’s guidance on developing reporting guidelines [5,6].”
A Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS) (2021, methodology): “For example, Moher et al.20 reported that, although over 63,000 new studies are published in PubMed on a monthly basis, many publications face the problem of inadequate reporting.”
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021, methodology): “[36, 62, 63] We updated the PRISMA 2009 statement by adapting the EQUATOR Network’s guidance for developing health research reporting guidelines.[64] We evaluated the reporting Table 1.”
The CARE Guidelines: Consensus-based Clinical Case Report Guideline Development (2013, neutral): “The developers of reporting guidelines have a responsibility to plan a dissemination and implementation strategy that supports guidelines utilization (Moher et al., 2010).”
SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. (2013, methodology): “As detailed later, the SPIRIT guideline was developed through 2 systematic reviews, a formal Delphi consensus process, 2 face-to-face consensus meetings, and pilottesting (32).”
The SCARE Statement: Consensus-based surgical case report guidelines. (2016, methodology): “In a subsequent round, participants were asked to rate their level of agreement with the revised item and any additional items that were suggested using a nine-point Likert scale and methodology as proposed by the GRADE group [11,12].”
The CARE Guidelines: Consensus‐Based Clinical Case Reporting Guideline Development (2013, positive): “The developers of reporting guidelines have a responsibility to plan a dissemination and implementation strategy that supports guidelines utilization.(15) Our efforts have several components:”
CONSORT-EHEALTH: Improving and Standardizing Evaluation Reports of Web-based and Mobile Health Interventions (2011, methodology): “In a web-based Delphi process we gathered some data on the importance of the items [14].”
PRISMA-Equity 2012 Extension: Reporting Guidelines for Systematic Reviews with a Focus on Health Equity (2012, methodology): “To produce these equity reporting guidelines (henceforth called PRISMA-E 2012), we followed recommendations [21] for the”
Reporting guidelines for health care simulation research: extensions to the CONSORT and STROBE statements (2016, methodology): “We conducted a multistep consensus process on the basis of previously described steps for developing health research reporting guidelines [42].”
Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement. (2015, neutral): “We followed published guidance for developing reporting guidelines [44] and established a steering committee (Drs. Collins, Reitsma, Altman, and Moons) to organize and coordinate the development of TRIPOD.”