The Joanna Briggs Institute reviewers' manual 2015: methodology for JBI scoping reviews

1,386 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Student perceptions of assessment feedback: a critical scoping review and call for research (2020, methodology): “Given the nature of the aims and research questions of this review, a scoping review approach was considered most appropriate (Arksey & O’Malley, 2005; Gough et al., 2012; Peters et al., 2015).”
Women and homelessness, a complex multidimensional issue: findings from a scoping review (2018, background): “dence without necessarily limiting the review to peer reviewed articles or particular research methodologies (Peters et al., 2015).”
Methods of usability testing in the development of eHealth applications: A scoping review (2019, unknown): “We chose to do a scoping review as our aim is to map the literature or evidence rather than seek to answer a specific question by only looking for the best available information, as defined in the Joanna Briggs Institute reviewers' manual 2015: Methodology for JBI scoping reviews [19].”