K. O’Brien

General Health Professions · Annals of Internal Medicine · 2008–2021

A researcher in the Science corpus: 6 papers; trusts 2 researchers and is trusted by 12 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom K. O’Brien trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. H. Arksey
  2. L. O’Malley
  3. H. Hsieh
  4. D. Levac

Who trusts K. O’Brien overall

  1. M. Peters
  2. Andrea C. Tricco
  3. Mathieu Templier
  4. R. Shelby
  5. C. Bradbury‐Jones
  6. A. Egan

Papers from K. O’Brien's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers K. O’Brien trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. (Health Information and Libraries Journal)
  2. What are scoping studies? A review of the nursing literature. (International Journal of Nursing Studies)
  3. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework
  4. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (Implementation science : IS)
  5. Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews (International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare)
  6. Synthesising research evidence.
  7. Enhancing the scoping study methodology: a large, inter-professional team’s experience with Arksey and O’Malley’s framework (BMC Medical Research Methodology)
  8. A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency (Research Synthesis Methods)
  9. 診断精度研究のバイアスリスク評価ツールQUADAS－2：a Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 の活用
  10. Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews (PLoS Medicine)

Their papers