Z. Munn
Statistics and Probability · 2014–2023
A researcher in the Science corpus: 16 papers; trusts 10 researchers and is trusted by 2 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.
Subfields
- Statistics and Probability — 80 citations into it; #11,350 of 12,932 by trust here, #1,650 by citations
- General Health Professions — 59 citations into it; #3,787 of 4,781 by trust here, #576 by citations
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health — 25 citations into it
Whom Z. Munn trusts overall
Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.
- Julian P. T. Higgins
- D. Gough
- A. Sutton
- Sandeep Moola
- E. Aromataris
- S. Green
- C. Lockwood
- J. Hayden
- S. Thorne
- J. Barendregt
Who trusts Z. Munn overall
- M. Peters
- C. Lockwood
- Lara N. Wolfers
- Firuz Kamalov
- B. Agyapong
- Cindy Stern
- Z. Younossi
- C. Bradbury‐Jones
- Andrea C. Tricco
- C. Godfrey
Papers from Z. Munn's perspective
Ordered by how strongly the researchers Z. Munn trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.
- Statistical Methods for Meta‐Analysis
- Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? (PLoS Medicine)
- A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. (Health Information and Libraries Journal)
- Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (Implementation science : IS)
- Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews (International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare)
- The development of a critical appraisal tool for use in systematic reviews addressing questions of prevalence. (International Journal of Health Policy and Management)
- Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (International Coaching Psychology Review)
- The development of software to support multiple systematic review types: the Joanna Briggs Institute System for the Unified Management, Assessment and Review of Information (JBI SUMARI) (International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare)
- The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study (Quality of Life Research)
- Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ (BMC Medical Research Methodology)
Their papers
- The development of a critical appraisal tool for use in systematic reviews addressing questions of prevalence. (2014) — 1,242 citations
- Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018) — 9,506 citations
- Methodological guidance for systematic reviews of observational epidemiological studies reporting prevalence and cumulative incidence data (2015) — 2,524 citations
- Qualitative research synthesis: methodological guidance for systematic reviewers utilizing meta-aggregation (2015) — 1,953 citations
- The development of software to support multiple systematic review types: the Joanna Briggs Institute System for the Unified Management, Assessment and Review of Information (JBI SUMARI) (2019) — 870 citations
- What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences (2018) — 972 citations
- Conducting systematic reviews of association (etiology): The Joanna Briggs Institute's approach (2015) — 659 citations
- The revised JBI critical appraisal tool for the assessment of risk of bias for randomized controlled trials. (2023) — 884 citations
- Best practice guidance and reporting items for the development of scoping review protocols (2022) — 943 citations
- Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews. (2022) — 1,416 citations
- Undertaking a scoping review: A practical guide for nursing and midwifery students, clinicians, researchers, and academics (2021) — 604 citations
- Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2020) — 6,077 citations
- Chapter 3: Systematic Reviews of Effectiveness (2020) — 991 citations
- Methodological quality of case series studies: an introduction to the JBI critical appraisal tool (2019) — 2,030 citations
- Fixed or random effects meta-analysis? Common methodological issues in systematic reviews of effectiveness (2015) — 867 citations
- Establishing confidence in the output of qualitative research synthesis: the ConQual approach (2014) — 757 citations