Cindy Stern
Statistics and Probability · 2018–2022
A researcher in the Science corpus: 7 papers; trusts 1 researcher and is trusted by 1 researcher here, as inferred from the citation graph.
Subfields
- Statistics and Probability — 51 citations into it; #12,926 of 12,932 by trust here, #3,703 by citations
Whom Cindy Stern trusts overall
Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.
Who trusts Cindy Stern overall
Papers from Cindy Stern's perspective
Ordered by how strongly the researchers Cindy Stern trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.
- Convergent and sequential synthesis designs: implications for conducting and reporting systematic reviews of qualitative and quantitative evidence (Systematic Reviews)
- Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? (PLoS Medicine)
- A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. (Health Information and Libraries Journal)
- Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews (International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare)
- The development of software to support multiple systematic review types: the Joanna Briggs Institute System for the Unified Management, Assessment and Review of Information (JBI SUMARI) (International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare)
- The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study (Quality of Life Research)
- The development of a critical appraisal tool for use in systematic reviews addressing questions of prevalence. (International Journal of Health Policy and Management)
- The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses
- Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ (BMC Medical Research Methodology)
- Assessing Bias in Studies of Prognostic Factors (Annals of Internal Medicine)
Their papers
- Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018) — 9,506 citations
- The development of software to support multiple systematic review types: the Joanna Briggs Institute System for the Unified Management, Assessment and Review of Information (JBI SUMARI) (2019) — 870 citations
- What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences (2018) — 972 citations
- Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews. (2022) — 1,416 citations
- Methodological guidance for the conduct of mixed methods systematic reviews (2020) — 611 citations
- Chapter 8: Mixed Methods Systematic Reviews (2019) — 335 citations
- Methodological quality of case series studies: an introduction to the JBI critical appraisal tool (2019) — 2,030 citations