Andrea C. Tricco

Statistics and Probability · 2007–2022

A researcher in the Science corpus: 17 papers; trusts 8 researchers and is trusted by 1 researcher here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Andrea C. Tricco trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. H. Arksey
  2. David Moher
  3. D. Levac
  4. L. O’Malley
  5. M. Peters
  6. Julian P. T. Higgins
  7. Heather Colquhoun
  8. Helena M Daudt
  9. Z. Munn
  10. K. O’Brien

Who trusts Andrea C. Tricco overall

  1. Matthew J. Page
  2. Dominik Schreyer
  3. R. Shelby
  4. J. Yepes‐Nuñez
  5. M. Peters
  6. C. Bradbury‐Jones
  7. Lara N. Wolfers
  8. Bertie Vidgen
  9. M. Ahsan
  10. A. Kuettel

Papers from Andrea C. Tricco's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Andrea C. Tricco trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. (Health Information and Libraries Journal)
  2. What are scoping studies? A review of the nursing literature. (International Journal of Nursing Studies)
  3. Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews (International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare)
  4. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework
  5. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (Implementation science : IS)
  6. 診断精度研究のバイアスリスク評価ツールQUADAS－2：a Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 の活用
  7. A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews (BMC Medical Research Methodology)
  8. Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? (PLoS Medicine)
  9. Enhancing the scoping study methodology: a large, inter-professional team’s experience with Arksey and O’Malley’s framework (BMC Medical Research Methodology)
  10. A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency (Research Synthesis Methods)

Their papers