Francesco Ackermann

General Decision Sciences · 2012

A researcher in the Science corpus: 1 paper; trusts 10 researchers and is trusted by 0 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• General Decision Sciences — 19 citations into it
• Safety Research — 10 citations into it
• Artificial Intelligence — 7 citations into it
• Cognitive Neuroscience — 5 citations into it
• Experimental and Cognitive Psychology — 5 citations into it
• Management Science and Operations Research — 5 citations into it

Whom Francesco Ackermann trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. E. Sadler‐Smith
2. Daniel Kahneman
3. G. Hodgkinson
4. M. Sinclair
5. Robin M. Hogarth
6. Erik Dane
7. Gary Klein
8. Jonathan Evans
9. Herbert A. Simon
10. Amos Tversky

Papers from Francesco Ackermann's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Francesco Ackermann trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. Exploring Intuition and its Role in Managerial Decision Making
2. Conditions for intuitive expertise: a failure to disagree. (American Psychologist)
3. The Role of Intuition in Strategic Decision Making
4. A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. (American Psychologist)
5. Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: the conjunction fallacy in probability judgment
6. Heuristics and Biases: Individual Differences in Reasoning: Implications for the Rationality Debate?
7. Developing Intuitive Awareness in Management Education
8. Intuition: A Challenge for Psychological Research on Decision Making
9. Misconceptions About Intuition
10. Unpacking Intuition: A Process and Outcome Framework

Their papers

• Understanding intuition: The case for two forms of intuition (2012) — 144 citations