Unpacking Intuition: A Process and Outcome Framework

120 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Wallas’ Four-Stage Model of the Creative Process: More Than Meets the Eye? (2015, background): “…& Pratt, 2009, p. 5); and (c) ‘‘slow-to-form affectively-charged judgments occurring in advance of an insight that combine knowledge in novel ways based on divergent associations, and which orient behavior in a direction that may lead to a creative outcome’’ (Gore & Sadler-Smith, 2012, p. 308).”
Understanding intuition: The case for two forms of intuition (2012, background): “Three particularly promising paths from the previously discussed literature are Sonenshein’s (2007) sensemaking-intuition model, the various models of knowledge levels and the two process-oriented articles (Glöckner and Witteman, 2009; Gore and Sadler-Smith, 2011).”
The Interplay between Intuition and Rationality in Strategic Decision Making: A Paradox Perspective (2017, unknown): “…type of intuition – expert intuition or problem-solving intuition – in which the intuitive process is not random or irrational but is based on experience and a solid and complete grasp of a problem’s details (Dane & Pratt, 2007; Gore & Sadler-Smith, 2011; Khatri & Ng, 2000; Simon, 1987).”