Misconceptions About Intuition

By M. Sinclair. 2010

104 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, General Decision Sciences, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8f6bd448690d2d5ff0cc2bf24e5d70b0edcf9fc0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Francesco Ackermann
2. Viktor Dörfler
3. E. Sadler‐Smith
4. Julie Gore

In General Decision Sciences

1. Francesco Ackermann
2. Viktor Dörfler
3. E. Sadler‐Smith
4. Julie Gore

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Francesco Ackermann
2. Viktor Dörfler
3. E. Sadler‐Smith
4. Julie Gore

Citations in the corpus

• Understanding intuition: The case for two forms of intuition (2012, background): “…literature also mentions and, occasionally, discusses in depth the role intuition plays in creativity (e.g. Claxton, 1998; Dane and Pratt, 2009; Hodgkinson et al., 2009a; Sinclair, 2010); however, apart from notable exceptions (Sinclair, 2010), intuition in creativity is still viewed as judgement.”
• Unpacking Intuition: A Process and Outcome Framework (2011, background): “Other researchers have sought to conceptualize different types of intuition in terms either of intuitive outcome or intuitive process (e.g., Dane & Pratt, 2009; Glöckner & Witteman, 2010; Sadler-Smith, 2008, 2010; Sinclair, 2010).”