Bob Heere

Sociology and Political Science · 2007–2017

A researcher in the Science corpus: 7 papers; trusts 15 researchers and is trusted by 8 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Sociology and Political Science — 77 citations into it; #6,873 of 22,756 by trust here, #6,353 by citations
• Gender Studies — 53 citations into it; #1,232 of 4,924 by trust here, #1,214 by citations
• Marketing — 42 citations into it; #5,725 of 6,289 by trust here, #3,890 by citations
• Strategy and Management — 29 citations into it; #10,042 of 10,874 by trust here, #6,119 by citations
• Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management — 25 citations into it; #8,034 of 8,741 by trust here, #5,837 by citations
• Social Psychology — 25 citations into it
• Economics and Econometrics — 14 citations into it; #12,244 of 23,481 by trust here, #16,755 by citations
• Information Systems and Management — 12 citations into it

Whom Bob Heere trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. Americus Reed
2. Jeffery D. James
3. Robert Madrigal
4. Daniel C. Funk
5. Rex Bryan Kline
6. Galen T. Trail
7. D. Wann
8. R. Ashmore
9. Sankar Sen
10. David M. Sluss

Who trusts Bob Heere overall

1. Daniel Lock
2. Daniel C. Funk
3. Masayuki Yoshida
4. J. Doyle
5. Jeffery D. James
6. Guillaume Bodet
7. Brad D. Carlson
8. Woosoon Kim
9. Brendan Dwyer
10. H. McDonald

Papers from Bob Heere's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Bob Heere trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. Developing an Understanding of Brand Associations in Team Sport: Empirical Evidence from Consumers of Professional Sport
2. Sport Fans: The Psychology and Social Impact of Spectators
3. Consumer–Company Identification: A Framework for Understanding Consumers’ Relationships with Companies
4. Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community (Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work)
5. Does Doing Good Always Lead to Doing Better? Consumer Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility
6. A model of fan identification: antecedents and sponsorship outcomes
7. Social identity theory: past achievements, current problems and future challenges
8. Group-level self-definition and self-investment: a hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification. (Journal of Personality and Social Psychology)
9. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, 2nd ed.
10. Social identity as a useful perspective for self-concept–based consumer research

Their papers

• Sports Teams and Their Communities: Examining the Influence of External Group Identities on Team Identity (2007) — 367 citations
• The Effect of Associated Group Identities on Team Identity (2011) — 111 citations
• Social Responsibility and the Olympic Games: The Mediating Role of Consumer Attributions (2010) — 165 citations
• Identity crisis: a theoretical analysis of ‘team identification’ research (2017) — 217 citations
• Predicting Behavioral Loyalty through Community: Why Other Fans Are More Important Than Our Own Intentions, Our Satisfaction, and the Team Itself (2015) — 238 citations
• Measuring Attitudinal Loyalty: Separating the Terms of Affective Commitment and Attitudinal Loyalty (2008) — 138 citations
• Stepping Outside the Lines: Developing a Multi-dimensional Team Identity Scale Based on Social Identity Theory (2007) — 199 citations